Cited by 24Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Higher-quality leader-member exchange (LMX), higher-level voice? The impact of LMX differentiation and LMX mean on promotive and prohibitive team voice

Zhao, Di, Wu, Jianlin, Gu, Jibao·2022·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-020-00985-w

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, D., Wu, J., & Gu, J.
Affiliations
  • Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Gu, Jibao
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2020-08-04
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
4692-4710
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3046993654
Cited by
24
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1708085MG174, 1808085MG223)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
leader-member exchange, LMX differentiation, promotive voice, prohibitive voice, conservation of resources theory, relational leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review