Cited by 123Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Meditation Awareness Training (MAT) for Psychological Well-Being in a Sub-Clinical Sample of University Students: A Controlled Pilot Study

Van Gordon, William, Shonin, Edo, Sumich, Alex, Sundin, Eva C., Griffiths, Mark D.·2013·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-012-0191-5

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Gordon, W., Shonin, E., Sumich, A., Sundin, E. C., & Griffiths, M. D.
Affiliations
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Corresponding author
Shonin, Edo
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2013-02-07
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2049776505
Cited by
123
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, psychological well-being, trait mindfulness, university students, stress, anxiety, depressive mood, emotional distress, positive affect, negative affect, emotion regulation, feasibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review