Cited by 97Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Why the Observing Subscale Does Not Predict Psychological Symptoms

Rudkin, Eve, Medvedev, Oleg N., Siegert, Richard J.·2018·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-017-0766-2

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudkin, E., Medvedev, O. N., & Siegert, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Siegert, Richard J.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
230-242
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2735837878
Cited by
96
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand (056330)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, mindfulness measurement, construct validity, emotional awareness, external perception, psychological symptoms, anxiety, stress, worry, meditation practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review