Cited by 66Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Effects of mindfulness meditation on self-transcendent states: Perceived body boundaries and spatial frames of reference

Open access
Hanley, Adam W., Dambrun, Michael, Garland, Eric L.·2020·Mindfulness

Abstract

Objectives Mindfulness training is believed to encourage self-transcendent states, but little research has examined this hypothesis. This study examined the effects of mindfulness training on two phenomenological features of self-transcendence: 1) perceived body boundary dissolution, and 2) more allocentric spatial frames of reference. Methods A sample of healthy, young adults (n=45) were randomized to five sessions of mindfulness training or an active listening control condition. Results Results indicated mindfulness training decreased perceived body boundaries (F 4,172=6.010, p<.001, η 2=.12) and encouraged more allocentric frames of reference (F 4,168=2.586, p=.039, η 2=.06). The expected inverse relationship was observed between perceived body boundaries and allocentric frames of reference ((β=-.58, p=.001)), and path analysis revealed the effect of mindfulness training on allocentric frames of reference was mediated by decreased perceived body boundaries (β=.24, se=.17, CI: 0.11 to 0.78). Conclusions Taken together, study results suggest that mindfulness training alters practitioners' experience of self, relaxing the boundaries of the self and extending the spatial frame of reference further beyond the physical body. Future studies are needed to explore the psychophysiological changes that co-occur with phenomenological reports of self-transcendence and the behavioral consequences following self-transcendent experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01330-9

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ST-related processes are associated with greater psychological flexibility, enhanced emotion regulation, increased connectedness, and more adaptive integration of challenging experiences.

    “Emerging empirical and theoretical work on mindfulness, meaning-making, and self-transcendent experience suggests that ST-related processes are associated with greater psychological flexibility, enhanced emotion regulation, increased connectedness, and more adaptive integration of challenging experiences (34–39).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper describes connection to other people and the environment as a component of self-transcendence (introductory discussion; page not available), and its Discussion links self-transcendent experiences with positive emotionality. It discusses emotion regulation as a benefit of mindfulness training, not specifically of self-transcendent processes. The cited passages do not establish greater psychological flexibility or more adaptive integration of challenging experiences. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Self-transcendence may represent a promising therapeutic pathway for moral injury recovery.

    “Building on this evolving clinical and theoretical landscape, this paper proposes that self-transcendence (ST)—conceived as a cultivable experiential state marked by reduced self-referential processing, broadened metacognitive awareness, self-transcendent affect, and prosocial meaning-making— may represent a promising therapeutic pathway for moral injury (MI) recovery (33–35).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion’s Limitations and Future Research Directions section reports preliminary evidence that mindfulness can induce self-transcendent states, supporting the premise that such states are cultivable. The paper does not address moral injury or evaluate self-transcendence as a pathway for its recovery; that therapeutic application is the citing authors’ proposal, not a finding of this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Contemporary psychological models conceptualize self-transcendence as a cultivable mode of consciousness characterized by reduced self-salience, attenuation of rigid self-world boundaries, enhanced perceived connectedness, and emergence of self-transcendent emotions such as compassion and moral elevation.

    “Contemporary psychological models increasingly conceptualize ST as a cultivable mode of consciousness characterized by reduced self-salience, attenuation of rigid self–world boundaries, enhanced perceived connectedness, and the emergence of self-transcendent emotions such as compassion and moral elevation (34, 35, 39, 56, 57).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper defines self-transcendence as a transient state involving self-loss and connection beyond the self (opening section; page unavailable). Its Discussion reports preliminary evidence that mindfulness can cultivate such states through dissolution of perceived self-boundaries. But it treats compassion as a possible consequence for future study and does not establish moral elevation as a feature of the state. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increases in decentering prospectively predict greater self-transcendent experiences, and decentering mediates the effect of mindfulness training on self-transcendent states.

    “Empirical evidence further indicates that increases in decentering prospectively predict greater self-transcendent experiences, with decentering mediating the effect of mindfulness training on self-transcendent states (34, 39).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that mindfulness training changed two features of self-transcendence and that perceived body-boundary dissolution mediated its effect on spatial frames of reference. It does not report that increases in decentering prospectively predicted self-transcendent experiences or that decentering was the mediator. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based decentering has been linked to greater acceptance, reduced avoidance-oriented responding, and less rigid self-focused appraisal.

    “Mindfulness-based decentering has been linked to greater acceptance, reduced avoidance-oriented responding, and less rigid self-focused appraisal (34, 36, 63).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The paper’s Conclusions (page unavailable) say mindfulness can decrease self-referential thoughts, and its Results report a shift toward more allocentric frames of reference. These support the less self-focused part of the claim, but the paper does not report that decentering increased acceptance or reduced avoidance-oriented responding; it did not measure those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Garland EL (2013). Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement for Addiction, Stress, and Pain. NASW Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanley, A. W., Dambrun, M., & Garland, E. L.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Garland, Eric L.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-02-14
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
1194-1203
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3006063885
Cited by
66
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA042033)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R61AT009296)
  • Mind and Life Institute (2015-Varela-Hanley,Adam)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, self-transcendence, body awareness, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review