Cited by 16Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Bringing Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders into Individual Therapy with Spanish Population: a Feasibility and Effectiveness Study

Massaro, Alessandro F., Lecuona, Oscar, García-Rubio, Carlos, Castro-Paredes, Antonieta·2022·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-022-01835-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massaro, A. F., Lecuona, O., García-Rubio, C., & Castro-Paredes, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2022-02-02
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
766-785
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4210452848
Cited by
15
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
mindfulness-based relapse prevention, substance use disorders, individual psychotherapy, relapse prevention, craving, substance use, mindfulness skills, relaxation training, usual care, feasibility, Spanish population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review