Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMental Health Research Topics

Stress Processing Mediates the Link Between Momentary Self-compassion and Affective Well-being

Ewert, Christina, Hoffmann, Cosma Frauke Antonia, Schröder-Abé, Michela·2022·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-022-01954-z

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewert, C., Hoffmann, C. F. A., & Schröder-Abé, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
Corresponding author
Ewert, Christina
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2022-08-09
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
2269-2281
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W4290729757
Cited by
18
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
potsdam graduate school
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
state self-compassion, emotional well-being, perceived stress, coping responses, positive affect, negative affect, within-person mediation, stress processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review