Cited by 842Physical Activity and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Sedentary Behavior: Emerging Evidence for a New Health Risk

Open access
Owen, Neville, Sparling, Phillip B., Healy, Geneviève N., Dunstan, David W., Matthews, Charles E.·2010·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4065/mcp.2010.0444

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dunstan DW, Barr ELM, Healy GN, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the AusDiab study. . 2010;121(3):384-391.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owen, N., Sparling, P. B., Healy, G. N., Dunstan, D. W., & Matthews, C. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (US)
Corresponding author
Sparling, Phillip B.
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
85
Issue
12
Pages
1138-1141
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042155709
Cited by
842
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
sedentary behavior, prolonged sitting, physical inactivity, health risks, built environment, manual labor
MeSH terms
Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Energy Metabolism, Health Status, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Triglycerides, Body Mass Index, Adiposity, Waist Circumference, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review