The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The attribution of attitudes
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the numerous studies that demonstrate the correspondence bias (e.g., Gilbert, Pelham, & Krull, 1988; Jones, 1979; Jones & Harris, 1967; Ross, Amabile, & Steinmetz, 1977; Snyder &Jones, 1974) typically manipulate the potential role of situational constraints rather than the potential role of ulterior motivation.”
From Suspicion and Dispositional Inference (1993) · cites this paper as Jones & Harris, 1967
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Self-citationSocial Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,843
Social perception and phenomenal causality.
Heider, F. (1944) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0055425 · Cited by 1,346
An experimental analysis of self-persuasion
Bem, D. J. (1965) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90026-0 · Cited by 632
Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.
Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. (1961) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048514 · Cited by 265
Self-citationSome Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality1
THIBAUT, J. W., & RIECKEN, H. W. (1955) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1955.tb01178.x · Cited by 219
The judgmental process in personality functioning.
Berkowitz, L. J. (1960) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048565 · Cited by 52
Role assignment and interpersonal influence.
Steiner, I. D., & Field, W. L. (1960) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040441 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Beyond Pygmalion effect: the role of managerial perception
Inamori, T., & Analoui, F. (2010) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/02621711011039132 · Cited by 10
A Study of Expectations and the Marital Quality of Participants of a Marital Enrichment Seminar
Dixon, L. J., Gordon, K. C., Frousakis, N. N., & Schumm, J. A. (2012) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00681.x · Cited by 10
Assessing Uncertainty in Physical Constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.039 · Cited by 10
Bitar, F. K., Chadwick-Jones, D., Nazaruk, M., & Boodhai, C. (2018) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2018.06.015 · Cited by 13
Perish the Forethought: Premeditation Engenders Misperceptions of Personal Control
Morewedge, C. K., Gray, K. J., & Wegner, D. M. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.003.0014 · Cited by 10
Commentaries on "The Really Fundamental Attribution Error in Social Psychological Research"
(2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1201_02 · Cited by 10
Authors' Response to Commentaries
Sabini, J. P., Siepmann, M., & Stein, J. (2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1201_03 · Cited by 10
Komplexität als Ursache steigender Risiken in Industrie und Handel
Erben, R. F., & Romeike, F. (2003) · Gabler Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-663-05715-4_2 · Cited by 10
The effects of individual and context on aggression in repeated social interaction
Martin, J. M., Juvina, I., Lebiere, C. J., & González, C. (2012) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.014 · Cited by 10
Do Attributions Change Over Time When the Actor's Behavior Is Hedonically Relevant to the Perceiver?
Truchot, D., Maure, G., & Patte, S. (2003) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540309598440 · Cited by 11
“In the first experiment, in which the classic Jones and Hams (1967) paradigm was used (Burger, 199 l), the participants watched a videotape of an “extemporaneous speech” on the issue of gun control given by a student.”
MethodNonverbal Behavior, Race, and Attitude Attributions
Hart, A. J., & Morry, M. M. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0008 · Cited by 10
Sewaid, A., Cestona, M. Á. G., & Silaghi, F. (2021) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12551 · Cited by 9
Social psychology: A field in search of a center
Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04570085 · Cited by 8
The Epistemic Contract: Fostering an Appropriate Level of Public Trust in Experts
MacCoun, R. J. (2015) · Nebraska Symposium on Motivation/The Nebraska symposium on motivation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16151-8_9 · Cited by 11
Why Should We Imitate Robots? Effect of Back Imitation on Judgment of Imitative Skill
Mohammad, Y. F. O., & Nishida, T. (2015) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-015-0282-2 · Cited by 10
“The attribution of higher imitation skill to the robot we imitated in this study can be though of as an instance of the famous fundamental attribution error [13].”
BackgroundHowell, R. (2013) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2013.836624 · Cited by 10
A Dual Mechanism Neural Framework for Social Understanding
Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., & Johnson, B. W. (2007) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080601085864 · Cited by 9
“…promising candidate is the fundamental attribution error (or actor–observer bias): the tendency of observers to favor internal (dispositional or personality) factors rather than environmental or situational influences when assigning causes to the behavior of others (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundSuccesses and failures in resisting cigarettes affect partner support for smoking cessation
vanDellen, M. R., Boyd, S. M., Ranby, K. W., & Beam, L. B. (2016) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2016.1255945 · Cited by 9
“The tendency to overweigh behaviours when evaluating others is particular likely when the enacted behaviours appear to involve free choice on the part of the actor (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundAn investigation into audiences’ reactions to transgressions by liked and disliked media figures.
Hu, M., Young, J., Liang, J., & Guo, Y. (2017) · Psychology of Popular Media Culture · doi:10.1037/ppm0000146 · Cited by 9
Social Psychological Skill and Its Correlates
Gollwitzer, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2018) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000332 · Cited by 9
Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz, L., Madon, S., & Turosak, A. (2018) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000286 · Cited by 9
Behavioral Decision Research, Social Class, and Implications for Public Policy
Hall, C. C. (2012) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 9
Rajagopalan, M., Sathar, M. B. A., & Parayitam, S. (2022) · FIIB Business Review · doi:10.1177/23197145221113375 · Cited by 9
Understanding Information Systems Outsourcing Success and Risks Through the Lens of Cognitive Biases
Rouse, A. C., & Corbitt, B. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 9
Lying and Deception in Politics
Robinson, P., Miller, D., Herring, E., & Bakir, V. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.42 · Cited by 10
The Use of Statistical Heuristics in Everyday Inductive Reasoning
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.030 · Cited by 9
Peretz‐Lange, R., & Muentener, P. (2019) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.05.005 · Cited by 9
Lacewing, M. (2018) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2018.0015 · Cited by 9
The Ethical Intention and Prediction Matrix: Reducing Perceptual and Cognitive Biases for Learning
Payne, S. L. (2006) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562905280843 · Cited by 9
“Many perceptual and attributional biases, such as actor and/or observer differences and the fundamental attribution error (Harvey, Harris, & Barnes, 1975; E. E. Jones & Harris, 1967), influence social interactions.”
BackgroundThe Belief in Majority Determination of Group Decision Outcomes
Allison, S. T., Beggan, J. K., McDonald, R. A., & Rettew, M. L. (1995) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1603_7 · Cited by 9
Senility versus Wisdom: The Meaning of Old Age as a Cause for Behavior
Green, S. K. (1984) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0502_2 · Cited by 9
MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCE OF BEHAVIORAL DESIRABILITY ON ACTORS' AND OBSERVERS' ATTRIBUTIONS
Lowe, C. A., & Ansen, R. D. (1976) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1976.4.1.17 · Cited by 9
The effect of responsibility attributions on message source evaluation
Kaplan, S. J., & Sharp, H. (1974) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637757409375861 · Cited by 9
Lying and Computational Linguistics
van Deemter, K., & Reiter, E. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.32 · Cited by 10
Hao, D. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01426-6 · Cited by 8
Seeing Bias: Discrediting and Dismissing Accurate Attributions
Benforado, A., & Hanson, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199737512.003.0019 · Cited by 8
Beliefs About Behavior Account for Age Differences in the Correspondence Bias
Stanley, J. T., & Blanchard–Fields, F. (2010) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq078 · Cited by 8
“The correspondence bias is typically studied by employing the attitude attribution paradigm (Jones & Harris, 1967), in which participants read an essay and are told that the author was instructed to write in a specific direction (i.e., for or against a controversial social issue).”
MethodPrädiktoren der Delinquenz bei adoleszenten Muslimen
Beller, J., Kröger, C. B., & Hosser, D. (2019) · Forensische Psychiatrie Psychologie Kriminologie · doi:10.1007/s11757-019-00523-w · Cited by 8
Hulsink, W., & Rauch, A. (2021) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2020.1865538 · Cited by 8
“They are also more likely to attribute success to their own effort (Jones & Harris, 1967), and autobiographies of entrepreneurs are often full of success stories.”
BackgroundWhen Your Boss Says, “You Need to Sound More Professional”: Writing Style and Writer Attributions
Campbell, K. S., Naidoo, J. S., & Smith, J. (2021) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884211025735 · Cited by 8
Le sujet cognitif de l’apprentissage
Tricot, A. (2014) · Recherches en éducation · doi:10.4000/ree.8519 · Cited by 8
Pfingsthorn, J., & Weltgen, J. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100160 · Cited by 8
Travail, chômage et stigmatisation
Bourguignon, D., & Herman, G. (2007) · De Boeck Supérieur eBooks · doi:10.3917/dbu.herma.2007.01.0145 · Cited by 7
Metacognitive inferences from other people’s memory performance.
Smith, R. W., & Schwarz, N. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000093 · Cited by 8
Social Cognition in Real Worlds: Cultural Psychology and Social Cognition
Morling, B., & Masuda, T. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446247631.n22 · Cited by 8
Stereotypes of Sex Offenders’ Romantic Partners Predict Intent to Discriminate
Plogher, T. J., Stevenson, M. C., & McCracken, E. W. (2016) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12126 · Cited by 8
Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.027 · Cited by 8
I know why you voted for Trump: (Over)inferring motives based on choice
Barasz, K., Kim, T., & Evangelidis, I. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.004 · Cited by 8
Are conservatives from Mars and liberals from Venus? Maybe not so much.
Skitka, L. J., & Washburn, A. N. (2016) · Cited by 8
The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals
Stevens, J. R., & King, A. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015 · Cited by 8
Higgins, E. T., & Winter, L. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195012 · Cited by 8
Adaptations for Nothing in Particular
Hampton, S. (2004) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00233.x · Cited by 8
On inferring one's beliefs from one's behavior in a low-choice setting.
Zanna, M. P. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034479 · Cited by 8
Social Roles, Social Norms, and Self-Presentation in the Quiz Effect of Ross, Amabile, and Steinmetz
Gibbins, K., & Walker, I. A. (1996) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1996.9714046 · Cited by 8
The effects of enthusiam and quality of arguments on attitude attribution1
Schneider, D. J., & Miller, R. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00730.x · Cited by 8
Attributions as Decisions: A Two Stage Information Processing Model
Anderson, C. A. (1991) · Recent research in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3126-4_4 · Cited by 8
Attributional Error and Attitudes toward Aging: A View of the NCOA National Attitude Survey
Shaver, K. G. (1979) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/2m62-nr5x-aybn-v53k · Cited by 8
McHoskey, J. W., & Miller, A. G. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294203004 · Cited by 8
Fundamental Errors in the Voting Booth
Glaeser, E. L., & Ponzetto, G. A. M. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23683 · Cited by 8
Internal and External Attributions
Gerace, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_2301 · Cited by 8
Gales, A., & Hubner, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00848 · Cited by 7
“Sense-Making as a Reason for Corresponding Evaluations of Competence With Technology in Oneself and in Others Our findings are in line with the sense-making process, in which a person connects other people’s attitude and behavior ultimately with each other (Jones and Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundResultO'Toole, M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2014) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2164-8204.jn19.4.173 · Cited by 7
McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_14 · Cited by 7
Meibauer, J. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.19 · Cited by 7
Zhang, G., Mao, J., & Hong, B. (2021) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2021.1904244 · Cited by 7
“Correspondent inference theory posits that a perceiver will attribute an actor’s behavior to the actor’s internal personal characteristics if the effects of the behavior are distinct from other behaviors and are socially undesirable (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundRamsdal, G. H., & Wynn, R. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192417025 · Cited by 9
“There is a risk that the positive education movement may reinforce the general tendency to over-emphasize personality-based explanations over the power of context, also called the fundamental attribution error [38].”
BackgroundMoral elevation affects the causal attributions about others’ behavior
Yarritu, I. (2023) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2023.2239773 · Cited by 7
“…bias refers to the tendency to underestimate the impact of situational factors (external causes) and to overestimate the influence of dispositional factors (internal causes) when judging the behavior of others (Gilbert & Malone, 1995; Jones & Harris, 1967; Ross, 1977, 2018; Walker et al., 2022).”
BackgroundPrinzing, M., Earp, B. D., & Knobe, J. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105579 · Cited by 7
Probabilistic Persuasion: A Brunswikian Theory of Argumentation
Reimer, T. O., Hertwig, R., & Sipek, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0004 · Cited by 9
Testing the Power of Game Lessons: The Effects of Art and Narrative on Reducing Cognitive Biases
Martey, R. M., Shaw, A., Stromer‐Galley, J., Kenski, K. M., Clegg, B. T., Folkestad, J., Saulnier, E. T., & Strzalkowski, T. (2014) · doi:10.26503/dl.v2014i1.631 · Cited by 7
“Fundamental attribution error is a related bias that is the tendency for people to attribute personality-based explanations for the behaviors they observe in others (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
Worchel, S., Insko, C. A., Mathie, V. A., & Drachman, D. (1974) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(74)90009-2 · Cited by 7
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.034 · Cited by 7
Commonplace forgiveness: From healthy relationships to healthy society.
Bono, G. (2005) · Humboldt Journal of Social Relations · Cited by 7
A test of gender–crime congruency on mock juror decision-making
Maeder, E. M., McManus, L. A., Yamamoto, S., & McLaughlin, K. J. (2018) · Cogent Psychology · doi:10.1080/23311908.2018.1461543 · Cited by 7
“In line with the verdict hypothesis, we expected that gender– crime congruent conditions would elicit greater blame attributions (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundAlceste, F., Crozier, W. E., & Strange, D. M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.08.005 · Cited by 7
Understanding reactions to deceit
Walczyk, J. J., & Newman, D. N. (2020) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100784 · Cited by 7
Wang, Q., & Senzaki, S. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190679743.003.0011 · Cited by 7
Social Learning: A Route to Good Cue Orders
García‐Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., Woike, J. K., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0012 · Cited by 7
Wealth is Associated with Lower Anxiety in a Sample of Lebanese Students
Abdel‐Khalek, A. M., & Yahfoufi, N. (2005) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.96.2.542-544 · Cited by 7
Butori, R., & Pez, V. (2012) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/076737011202700403 · Cited by 7
Attribution Theory: A Fit with Substance Abuse Problems
Baumann, D. J., Obitz, F. W., & Reich, J. W. (1982) · International Journal of the Addictions · doi:10.3109/10826088209071013 · Cited by 7
Jonas, K. W., & Lebherz, C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71633-4_15 · Cited by 7
Auditors' Assessment of Management's Disposition: An Attributional Analysis*
Reckers, P. M. J., Wong‐On‐Wing, B., & Krull, G. W. (1992) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1992.tb00428.x · Cited by 7
ATTRIBUTIONAL PROCESSES IN ADULT DEVELOPMENT
Blanchard–Fields, F. (1986) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/0380127860120404 · Cited by 7
Running Head: CULTURE AND THOUGHT Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Ara Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Cited by 7
e-Bay's happy hour: Non rational herding in online auctions
Simonsohn, U., & Ariely, D. (2004) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e722842011-021 · Cited by 7
“A classical experiment by Jones & Harris (1967), for example, showed that people’s judgments about the political views of a speaker were influenced by the topic of the speech (focal) but not by whether or not the topic had been assigned or chosen (non-focal).”
BackgroundUsing Behavioural Insights to Argue for a Stronger Social Safety Net: Beyond Libertarian PaternalismPreprint
Curchin, K. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2834711 · Cited by 7
When do people rely on algorithms
Logg, J. M. (2016) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 7
“I'm so stressed!”: The relational consequences of stress bragging
Rodell, J. B., Shanklin, B. C., & Frank, E. L. (2024) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12645 · Cited by 6
Reeves, A., Calic, D., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2024) · Computers & security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104179 · Cited by 4
A signaling theory of self-handicapping
Xiang, Y., Gershman, S. J., & Gerstenberg, T. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106288 · Cited by 6
Health inequality attributions and support for healthcare policy
Baute, S. (2025) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117946 · Cited by 7
The Heart Has Its Reasons: Social Rationality in Mate Choice
Lenton, A. P., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0016 · Cited by 6
Compassion and the fundamental attribution error: A reply to Rolfe & Gardner
Paley, J. (2014) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.013 · Cited by 6
“In one classic study (Jones and Harris, 1967), participants inferred that students who had written essays favourable to Castro had pro-Castro attitudes, despite being informed that the student assignment had been to write an essay defending him.”
BackgroundDecker, K. A., & Lord, C. G. (2021) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2817 · Cited by 6
Lackey, J. A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.18 · Cited by 6
Kanamori, M., Stickley, A., Takemura, K. N., Kobayashi, Y., Oka, M., Ojima, T., Kondo, K., & Kondo, N. (2023) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s104161022300087x · Cited by 6
“However, an observer may misunder-stand this normative behavior as being caused by internal attitudes (Jones and Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundExploring the Role of Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Hypnosis: A Theoretical Review
Knafo, G., & Weinberger, J. L. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14040374 · Cited by 7
“The correspondence bias, sometimes also known as the fundamental attribution error, was first identified by Jones and Harris [30].”
BackgroundPsychological Determinants of Public Opinion
Skitka, L. J., & Mullen, E. (2002) · Social psychological applications to social issues · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0569-3_6 · Cited by 6
“To investigate this hypothesis, Skita and Griffin (2000) ran a modified version of the class attitude-attribution paradigm ( Jones & Harris, 1967 ).”
BackgroundBuilding Safer AGI by introducing Artificial Stupidity
Trazzi, M., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.03644 · Cited by 15
“Another notorious example is the Fundamental Attribution Error, attributing certain mental states to individuals because of their behavior, and not because of the logical implications of the context [32] [33].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1967-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-24
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103278175
- Cited by
- 1,783
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 82
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- attitude attribution, prior probability, situational constraints, reference groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review