Cited by 23Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Cascading bidirectional influences of digital media use and mental health in adolescence

Flannery, Jessica S., Maza, Maria T., Kilic, Zelal, Telzer, Eva H.·2023·Advances in Child Development and Behavior

Abstract

A substantial portion of critical adolescent development is occurring within digital environments. However, certain individual differences may lead adolescents to use digital media in diverse ways. In this chapter we suggest that the way teens use digital media influences how digital media affects their mental health. Further, we propose a model in which these influences, in the context of ongoing development, may have feedback effects on how digital media is subsequently used, thus resulting in a self-perpetuating cycle. Our model suggests that certain developmental risk/protective factors and maladaptive/adaptive digital media behaviors likely perpetuate each other in a cyclical manner each serving to maintain and/or escalate the other. We discuss existing evidence of these processes in psychosocial, identity, incentive processing, and physical health development. Future research focusing on individual differences and self-reinforcing digital media behaviors that manifest these feedback loops may portray a more complete picture of cascading digital media influences across adolescent development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.10.003

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bidirectional associations between screen time and mental health could be supported by the self-perpetuating feedback loop model, whereby screen use leads to worsening mental health and poor mental health leads to increasing reliance on screens to cope.

    “Bidirectional associations between screen time and mental health could be supported by the self-perpetuating feedback loop model [131], whereby screen use leads to worsening mental health and poor mental health leads to increasing reliance on screens to cope [132].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flannery, J. S., Maza, M. T., Kilic, Z., & Telzer, E. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Telzer, Eva H.
Venue
Advances in Child Development and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2023
Volume
64
Pages
255-287
ISSN
0065-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312798038
Cited by
23
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
33.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in child development and behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
digital media use, adolescent mental health, bidirectional effects, feedback loops, individual differences, identity construction, incentive processing, physical health, psychosocial development
MeSH terms
Digital Technology, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Models, Psychological, Adolescent Development, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review