Cited by 196Sleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Nodding off or switching off? The use of popular media as a sleep aid in secondary‐school children

Eggermont, Steven, Van den Bulck, Jan·2006·Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Abstract

Aim: To describe the use of media as a sleep aid in adolescents and relate this to their sleep routines and feelings of tiredness. Methods: A questionnaire about using media as a sleep aid, media presence in bedrooms, time to bed and time out of bed on average weekdays and average weekend days, and questions regarding level of tiredness in the morning, at school, after a day at school and after the weekend was completed by 2546 seventh and 10th grade children in a random sample of 15 schools. Results: Of the adolescents, 36.7% reported watching television to help them fall asleep. In total, 28.2% of the boys and 14.7% of the girls used computer games as a sleep aid. Music was used to fall asleep by 60.2% of the adolescents in this sample. About half of the adolescents read books to fall asleep. Except for reading books, using media as a sleep aid is negatively related to respondents’ time to bed on weekdays, their number of hours of sleep per week and their self‐reported level of tiredness. Conclusion: Using media as a sleep aid appears to be common practice among adolescents. Those who reported using music, television, and computer games more often as a sleeping aid slept fewer hours and were significantly more tired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00892.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eggermont, S., & Van den Bulck, J.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07
Volume
42
Issue
7-8
Pages
428-433
ISSN
  • 1034-4810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1754
OpenAlex
W2149714119
Cited by
196
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
sleep aids, media use, adolescents, high school students, bedtime, sleep duration, fatigue, television, video games, reading, sleep routines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Belgium, Computers, Female, Humans, Male, Music, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Television

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review