Cited by 133Impact of Technology on AdolescentsIdentity, Memory, and TherapyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator

Yang, Chia-chen, Holden, Sean M., Carter, Mollie D. K.·2018·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Social comparison on social media has received increasing attention, but most research has focused on one type of social comparison and its psycho-emotional implications. Little is known about how different types of social comparison influence youth's identity development. Drawing on the theories of identity processing styles and social comparison, we examined how two different forms of social comparison on social media related to three identity processing styles, which in turn predicted youth's global self-esteem and identity clarity. We surveyed 219 college freshmen (M age = 18.29; 74% female) once in the Fall and once in the Spring. Social comparison of ability on social media was related to concurrent diffuse-avoidant identity processing style, which predicted lower identity clarity months later. In contrast, social comparison of opinion on social media did not influence college freshmen's global self-esteem and identity clarity through identity processing styles. The findings clarified the implications of online social comparison for youth's identity development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-017-0801-6

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a negative relationship between opinion comparison and self-concept clarity when measures were taken approximately five months after the initial assessment.

    “There was a negative relationship between opinion comparison and self-concept clarity when measures were taken approximately five months after the initial assessment (Yang et al., 2018a).”

    From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2018a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, C.-C., Holden, S. M., & Carter, M. D. K.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Yang, Chia-chen
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2018-01-11
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
2114-2128
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2784285102
Cited by
133
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
social comparison, social media, identity processing styles, self-esteem, university students, identity construction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Social Identification, United States, Universities, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review