Cited by 190Sleep and related disordersImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Sleep problems: Predictor or outcome of media use among emerging adults at university?

Tavernier, Royette, Willoughby, Teena·2014·Journal of Sleep Research

Abstract

The pervasiveness of media use in our society has raised concerns about its potential impact on important lifestyle behaviours, including sleep. Although a number of studies have modelled poor sleep as a negative outcome of media use, a critical assessment of the literature indicates two important gaps: (i) studies have almost exclusively relied on concurrent data, and thus have not been able to assess the direction of effects; and (ii) studies have largely been conducted with children and adolescents. The purpose of the present 3-year longitudinal study, therefore, was to examine whether both sleep duration and sleep problems would be predictors or outcomes of two forms of media use (i.e. television and online social networking) among a sample of emerging adults. Participants were 942 (71.5% female) university students (M = 19.01 years, SD = 0.90) at Time 1. Survey measures, which were assessed for three consecutive years starting in the first year of university, included demographics, sleep duration, sleep problems, television and online social networking use. Results of a cross-lagged model indicated that the association between sleep problems and media use was statistically significant: sleep problems predicted longer time spent watching television and on social networking websites, but not vice versa. Contrary to our hypotheses, sleep duration was not associated with media use. Our findings indicate no negative effects of media use on sleep among emerging adults, but instead suggest that emerging adults appear to seek out media as a means of coping with their sleep problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsr.12132

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavernier, R., & Willoughby, T.
Affiliations
Brock University (CA)
Corresponding author
Tavernier, Royette
Venue
Journal of Sleep Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-19
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
389-396
ISSN
  • 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2869
OpenAlex
W2115492841
Cited by
190
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sleep Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
sleep disorders, media use, emerging adults, university students, television viewing, online social networking, sleep duration, direction of effect, longitudinal associations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Students, Television, Time Factors, Universities, Young Adult, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review