Cited by 152Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Influence of visitor presence on the behaviour of captive lion-tailed macaques (Macaca silenus) housed in Indian zoos

Mallapur, Avanti, Sinha, Anindya, Waran, Natalie·2005·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

To study the influence of ‘visitor presence’ on captive lion-tailed macaques, a behavioural study (Short Term Effects) was conducted on 30 individuals housed in 8 zoos across India. The study animals were observed on ‘visitor presence’ days and on ‘visitor absence’ days, which were zoo holidays. To record the long-term impact of ‘visitor presence’ on captive primate behaviour, a study on the Long Term Effects was also conducted. In this study, the behaviour of seven singly-housed individuals was recorded independently when ‘on-exhibit’ and ‘off-exhibit’ in enclosures of similar sizes. In the Short Term Effects, visitors influenced 20% more abnormal behaviour and 3% more social, mating and aggressive behaviours. In the study on Long Term Effects, visitors were found to influence a 30% increase in abnormal behaviour. In addition, in this study on Long Term Effects, use of space in the enclosure varied with individuals using the areas of the enclosure with trees, shrubs and water bodies (enriched zone) more when ‘off-exhibit’ than when ‘on-exhibit’. ‘Visitor presence’ was thus found to influence the behaviour of captive lion-tailed macaques in a negative way suggesting that ‘visitor presence’ might adversely affect their welfare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.012

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mallapur, A., 2005. The welfare of captive lion-tailed macaques housed in Indian zoos. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 303 p.
  2. Venugopal, 1993, Visitor behaviour at lion-tailed macaque in the Mysore Zoo, Zoos’ Print, 8, 45

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallapur, A., Sinha, A., & Waran, N.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Advanced Studies (IN)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Mallapur, Avanti
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
94
Issue
3-4
Pages
341-352
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059616771
Cited by
152
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
lion-tailed macaque, Macaca silenus, abnormal behaviour, animal welfare, enclosure use, environmental enrichment, zoo enclosures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review