Cited by 97Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Examining cyberbullying across the lifespan

Barlett, Christopher P., Chamberlin, Kristina·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.009

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlett, C. P., & Chamberlin, K.
Affiliations
Gettysburg College (US)
Corresponding author
Barlett, Christopher P.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
71
Pages
444-449
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2583282528
Cited by
97
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying perpetration, anonymity, learning theory, age differences, lifespan development, youth, emerging adulthood, online time, cyberbullying intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review