Cited by 118Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of reward-related brain activation: Effects of age, pubertal stage, and reward sensitivity

Open access
van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C.K., Op de Macks, Zdeňa A., Overgaauw, Sandy, Gunther Moor, Bregtje, Dahl, Ronald E., Crone, Eveline A.·2014·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Neurobiological models suggest that adolescents are driven by an overactive ventral striatum (VS) response to rewards that may lead to an adolescent increase in risk-taking behavior. However, empirical studies showed mixed findings of adolescents' brain response to rewards. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between reward-related brain activation and risky decision-making. In addition, we examined effects of age, puberty, and individuals' reward sensitivity. We collected two datasets: Experiment 1 reports cross-sectional brain data from 75 participants (ages 10-25) who played a risky decision task. Experiment 2 presents a longitudinal extension in which a subset of these adolescents (n=33) was measured again 2years later. Results showed that (1) a reward-related network including VS and medial PFC was consistently activated over time, (2) the propensity to choose the risky option was related to increased reward-related activation in VS and medial PFC, and (3) longitudinal comparisons indicated that self-reported reward sensitivity was specifically related to VS activation over time. Together, these results advance our insights in the brain circuitry underlying reward processing across adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.005

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Barkley-Levenson, E. E., Van Leijenhorst, L., & Galvan, A. (2013). Behavioral and neural correlates of loss aversion and risk avoidance in adolescents and adults. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 72-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.dcn.2012.09.007. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beaver, J. D., Lawrence, A. D., Van Ditzhuijzen, J., Davis, M. H., Woods, A., & Calder, A. J. (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 5160-5166. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0350-06.2006. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bjork, J. M., Knutson, B., & Hommer, D. W. (2008). Incentive-elicited striatal activation in adolescent children of alcoholics. Addiction, 103, 1308-1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02250.x. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Buckholtz, J. W., Treadway, M. T., Cowan, R. L., Woodward, N. D., Benning, S. D., Li, R., et al. (2010). Mesolimbic dopamine reward system hypersensitivity in individuals with psychopathic traits. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 419-421. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2510. · DOI
  5. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
  6. Cohen, M. X., Bour, L., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Vink, M., Tijssen, M. A. J., et al. (2012). Top-down directed synchrony from medial frontal cortex to nucleus accumbens during reward anticipation. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 246-252. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21195. · DOI
  7. Delgado, M. R. (2007). Reward-related responses in the human striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 70-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/ annals.1390.002. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ernst, M., & Fudge, J. L. (2009). A developmental neurobiological model of motivated behavior: Anatomy, connectivity and ontogeny of the triadic nodes. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 367-382. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.009. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eshel, N., Nelson, E. E., Blair, J. R., Pine, D. S., & Ernst, M. (2007). Neural substrates of choice selection in adults and adolescents: Development of the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1270-1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.004. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Phillips, M. L., Manuck, S. B., Worthman, C. M., Moyles, D. L., et al. (2010). Healthy adolescents' neural response to reward: Associations with puberty, positive affect, and depressive symptoms. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 162-172.
  11. Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997). Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 6, 218-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0291. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Galvan, A. (2010). Adolescent development of the reward system. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.006.2010. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Davidson, M., Spicer, J., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2005). The role of ventral frontostriatal circuitry in reward-based learning in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8650-8656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.2431-05.2005. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., et al. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6885-6892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1062-06.2006. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gunther Moor, B., Op de Macks, Z., Gürog ˘lu, B., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Van der Molen, M. W., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Neurodevelopmental changes of reading the mind in the eyes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 44-52. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr020. · DOI
  16. Kennerley, S. W., & Walton, M. E. (2011). Decision making and reward in frontal cortex: Complementary evidence from neurophysiological and neuropsychological studies. Behavioral Neuroscience, 125, 297-317. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023575. · DOI
  17. Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47, 763-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.008. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Liu, X., Powell, D. K., Wang, H., Gold, B. T., Corbly, C. R., & Joseph, J. E. (2007). Functional dissociation in frontal and striatal areas for processing of positive and negative reward information. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4587-4597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5227-06.2007. · DOI
  19. Luciana, M., & Collins, P. F. (2012). Incentive motivation, cognitive control, and the adolescent brain: Is it time for a paradigm shift? Child Development Perspectives, 6, 392-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00252.x. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mohr, P. N., Biele, G., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010). Neural processing of risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 6613-6619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003- 10.2010. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nelson, E. E., Leibenluft, E., McClure, E. B., & Pine, D. S. (2005). The social re- orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35, 163-174. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291704003915. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Paulsen, D. J., McKell Carter, R., Platt, M. L., Huettel, S. A., & Brannon, E. M. (2012). Neurocognitive development of risk aversion from early childhood to adulthood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fnhum.2011.00178. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Paulus, M. P., Rogalsky, C., Simmons, A., Feinstein, J. S., & Stein, M. B. (2003). Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism. NeuroImage, 19, 1439-1448. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00251-9. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Peper, J. S., Mandl, R. C. W., Braams, B. R., de Water, E., Heijboer, A. C., Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., et al. (2012). Delay discounting and frontostriatalfiber tracts: A combined DTI and MTR study on impulsive choices in healthy young adults. Cerebral Cortex. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs163 (epub ahead of print). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 117-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01537962. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Rao, H., Korczykowski, M., Pluta, J., Hoang, A., & Detre, J. A. (2008). Neural correlates of voluntary and involuntary risk taking in the human brain: An fMRI study of the balloon analog risk task (BART). NeuroImage, 42, 902-910. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.046. · DOI
  27. Richards, J., Plate, R. C., & Ernst, M. (2013). A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: The impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 976-991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2013.03.004. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rushworth, M., Mars, R. B., & Summerfield, C. (2012). General mechanisms for making decisions? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 75-83. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.conb.2009.02.005. · DOI
  29. Rushworth, M., Noonan, M. P., Boorman, E. D., Walton, M. E., & Behrens, T. E. (2011). Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making. Neuron, 70, 1054-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.014. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M., & Casey, B. J. (2010). A time of change: Behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues. Brain and Cognition, 72, 124-133. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.003. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self report: Evidence for a dual system model. Developmental Psychobiology, 44, 1764-1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012955. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tom, S. M., Fox, C. R., Trepel, C., & Poldrack, R. A. (2007). The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk. Science, 315, 515-518. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134239. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron, 41, 281-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896- 6273(03)00848-1. · DOI
  34. Tymula, A., Rosenberg Belmaker, L. A., Roy, A. K., Ruderman, L., Manson, K., Glimcher, P. W., et al. (2012). Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity. PNAS, 109, 17135-17140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1207144109. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Van den Bos, W., Cohen, M. X., Kahnt, T., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Striatum-medial prefrontal cortex connectivity predicts developmental changes in reinforcement learning. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1247-1255. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/cercor/bhr198. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2013). A neuroeconomic approach to adolescent decision-making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 108-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475446. · DOI
  37. Van Leijenhorst, L., Zanolie, K., Van Meel, C. S., Westenberg, P. M., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010). What motivates the adolescent? Brain regions mediating reward sensitivity across adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 61-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp078. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Manual (3rd ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
  39. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Administration and scoring manual (3rd ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
  40. Xue, G., Lu, Z., Levin, I. P., Weller, J. A., Li, X., & Bechara, A. (2009). Functional dissociations of risk and reward processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1019-1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn147. · DOI
  41. Yu, R., Branje, S. J. T., Keijsers, L., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in Dutch adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 500-507. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/00223891.2011.595745. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Op de Macks, Z. A., Overgaauw, S., Gunther Moor, B., Dahl, R. E., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
89
Pages
3-14
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053837442
Cited by
118
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
reward processing, ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, risky decision making, reward sensitivity, puberty, adolescence, age differences, risk-taking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain Mapping, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Puberty, Reward, Risk-Taking, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review