Cited by 14Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Micro-encapsulation differentially impacts probiotic effects on brain structure and function in an elderly population - a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Rode, Julia, Hutchinson, Ashley N., Chatzopoulou, Myrto S., Bleiel, Sinéad B., Gebresenbet, Rediet Fikru, Andersson, Linda, Persson, Jonas, Daillère, Romain +5 more·2025·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that modulations of the gut-brain axis with probiotics impact healthy ageing. This double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study compared effects of micro-encapsulated and non-encapsulated Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 in 87 community-dwelling elderly (60-80 years). Resting state functional connectivity differed significantly in regions involved in visual processing and perception between the two probiotic groups (p < 0.0001). Brain morphometry was not altered. Significant time*group effects (p < 0.05) were observed for processing speed, non-significant effects were observed for short-term memory and anxiety symptoms, while other cognitive domains, depression, perceived stress, and sleep quality were unaffected. Distribution of available and stored peripheral serotonin was significantly affected (p < 0.05), while levels of γ-aminobutyric acid and glutamate in striatum and circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor did not show significant time*group effects. Micro-encapsulated probiotics target the gut differently, which impacts the effects on brain health assessed by (functional) magnetic resonance imaging in older adults. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under ID: NCT05801042.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2025.106113

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study design ranked participants by sex and age and employed high compliance and quality control in neuroimaging data acquisition, providing robust insight into psychobiotic effects on brain function.

    “The study design, which ranked participants by sex and age and employed high compliance and quality control in neuroimaging data acquisition, provided robust insight into psychobiotic effects on brain function.”
  • In that study, peripheral serotonin levels showed significant changes over time, but no notable differences were detected in GABA, glutamate, or BDNF.

    “While peripheral serotonin levels showed significant changes over time, no notable differences were detected in GABA, glutamate, or BDNF.”
  • In community-dwelling individuals, micro-encapsulated and non-encapsulated Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HN001 produced significant differences in resting-state functional connectivity within regions associated with visual processing and perception, but no changes in brain morphometry.

    “Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant differences in functional connectivity within regions associated with visual processing and perception between the two probiotic formulations, although no changes in brain morphometry were observed.”
  • Micro-encapsulation appeared to influence gut delivery and, consequently, the impact on functional brain connectivity.

    “Micro-encapsulation appeared to influence gut delivery and, consequently, the impact on functional brain connectivity.”
  • Targeted psychobiotic interventions can modulate functional connectivity in the aging brain and selectively improve cognitive performance.

    “Nonetheless, the study demonstrates that targeted psychobiotic interventions can modulate functional connectivity in the aging brain and selectively improve cognitive performance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rode, J., Hutchinson, A. N., Chatzopoulou, M. S., Bleiel, S. B., Gebresenbet, R. F., Andersson, L., Persson, J., Daillère, R., Beitz, B., Ben Abdallah, B., Tingö, L., Bergh, C., & Brummer, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • AnaBio Technologies (Ireland) (IE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • BIOASTER (FR)
Corresponding author
Rode, Julia
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
130
Pages
106113
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414422182
Cited by
11
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Dr Per Hakansson Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, microencapsulation, gut-brain axis, healthy aging, older adults, resting-state functional connectivity, brain morphometry, processing speed, peripheral serotonin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, visual processing, striatum
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Probiotics, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review