Cited by 187Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Altered prefrontal and insular cortical thickness in adolescent marijuana users

Open access
Lopez-Larson, Melissa P., Bogorodzki, Piotr, Rogowska, Jadwiga, McGlade, Erin, King, Jace B., Terry, Janine, Yurgelun-Todd, Deborah·2011·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Introduction There are limited data regarding the impact of marijuana (MJ) on cortical development during adolescence. Adolescence is a period of substantial brain maturation and cortical thickness abnormalities may be indicative of disruptions of normal cortical development. This investigation applied cortical-surface based techniques to compare cortical thickness measures in MJ using adolescents compared to non-using controls.Methods Eighteen adolescents with heavy MJ use and 18 non-using controls similar in age received MRI scans using a 3T Siemens scanner. Cortical reconstruction and volumetric segmentation was performed with FreeSurfer. Group differences in cortical thickness were assessed using statistical difference maps covarying for age and gender.Results Compared to non-users, MJ users had decreased cortical thickness in right caudal middle frontal, bilateral insula and bilateral superior frontal cortices. Marijuana users had increased cortical thickness in the bilateral lingual, right superior temporal, right inferior parietal and left paracentral regions. In the MJ users, negative correlations were found between frontal and lingual regions for urinary cannabinoid levels and between age of onset of use and the right superior frontal gyrus.Conclusion This is one of the first studies to evaluate cortical thickness in a group of adolescents with heavy MJ use compared to non-users. Our findings are consistent with prior studies that documented abnormalities in prefrontal and insular regions. Our results suggest that age of regular use may be associated with altered prefrontal cortical gray matter development in adolescents. Furthermore, reduced insular cortical thickness may be a biological marker for increased risk of substance dependence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.02.001

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent marijuana users show reduced cortical thickness in middle, superior frontal and insular cortices, but increased thickness in more posterior cortical regions such as superior temporal and inferior parietal cortices, compared to non-users.

    “For example, adolescent marijuana users show reduced cortical thickness in middle, superior frontal and insular cortices, but increased thickness in more posterior cortical regions such as the superior temporal and inferior parietal cortices, compared to non-users (Lopez-Larson et al., 2011).”

    From Sensitive periods of substance abuse: Early risk for the transition to dependence (2017) · cites this paper as Lopez-Larson et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [62]Hamilton A Diagnosis and rating of anxiety British Journal of Psychiatry 1969 Special Publication 76 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopez-Larson, M. P., Bogorodzki, P., Rogowska, J., McGlade, E., King, J. B., Terry, J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lopez-Larson, Melissa P.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
220
Issue
1
Pages
164-172
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985552279
Cited by
187
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH087831, 5-T32-MH19126, T32MH019126)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020269)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cannabis use, cortical thickness, prefrontal cortex, insula, gray matter development, age of onset, brain maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Mapping, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Prefrontal Cortex, Age of Onset, Statistics, Nonparametric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review