Cited by 222Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychedelics and Drug Studies

A critical review of the antipsychotic effects of cannabidiol: 30 years of a translational investigation

Waldo Zuardi, Antonio, Alexandre S. Crippa, Jose, E.C. Hallak, Jaime, Bhattacharyya, Sagnik, Atakan, Zerrin, Martin-Santos, Rocio, K. McGuire, Philip, Silveira Guimaraes, Francisco·2012·Current Pharmaceutical Design

Abstract

Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC) is the main compound of the Cannabis Sativa responsible for most of the effects of the plant. Another major constituent is cannabidiol (CBD), formerly regarded to be devoid of pharmacological activity. However, laboratory rodents and human studies have shown that this cannabinoid is able to prevent psychotic-like symptoms induced by high doses of Δ(9)- THC. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that CBD has antipsychotic effects as observed using animal models and in healthy volunteers. Thus, this article provides a critical review of the research evaluating antipsychotic potential of this cannabinoid. CBD appears to have pharmacological profile similar to that of atypical antipsychotic drugs as seem using behavioral and neurochemical techniques in animal models. Additionally, CBD prevented human experimental psychosis and was effective in open case reports and clinical trials in patients with schizophrenia with a remarkable safety profile. Moreover, fMRI results strongly suggest that the antipsychotic effects of CBD in relation to the psychotomimetic effects of Δ(9)-THC involve the striatum and temporal cortex that have been traditionally associated with psychosis. Although the mechanisms of the antipsychotic properties are still not fully understood, we propose a hypothesis that could have a heuristic value to inspire new studies. These results support the idea that CBD may be a future therapeutic option in psychosis, in general and in schizophrenia, in particular.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138161212802884681

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waldo Zuardi, A., Alexandre S. Crippa, J., E.C. Hallak, J., Bhattacharyya, S., Atakan, Z., Martin-Santos, R., K. McGuire, P., & Silveira Guimaraes, F.
Venue
Current Pharmaceutical Design
Published
2012-09-12
Volume
18
Issue
32
Pages
5131-5140
ISSN
1381-6128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170079005
Cited by
222
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pharmaceutical Design (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR-CS-011-001)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Keywords
cannabidiol, antipsychotic effects, schizophrenia, psychosis, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, psychotomimetic effects, atypical antipsychotics, striatum, temporal cortex, functional MRI, translational research, drug safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cannabidiol, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Antipsychotic Agents, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review