Cited by 48Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Validation of a novel attentional bias modification task: the future may be in the cards

Open access
Notebaert, Lies, Clarke, Patrick J.F., Grafton, Ben, MacLeod, Colin·2015·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Attentional bias modification (ABM) is a promising therapeutic tool aimed at changing patterns of attentional selectivity associated with heightened anxiety. A number of studies have successfully implemented ABM using the modified dot-probe task. However others have not achieved the attentional change required to achieve emotional benefits, highlighting the need for new ABM methods. The current study compared the effectiveness of a newly developed ABM task against the traditional dot-probe ABM task. The new person-identity-matching (PIM) task presented participants with virtual cards, each depicting a happy and angry person. The task encourages selective attention toward or away from threat by requiring participants to make matching judgements between two cards, based either on the identities of the happy faces, or of the angry faces. Change in attentional bias achieved by both ABM tasks was measured by a dot-probe assessment task. Their impact on emotional vulnerability was assessed by measuring negative emotional reactions to a video stressor. The PIM task succeeded in modifying attentional bias, and exerting an impact on emotional reactivity, whereas this was not the case for the dot-probe task. These results are considered in relation to the potential clinical utility of the current task in comparison to traditional ABM methodologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.007

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Notebaert, L., Clarke, P. J. F., Grafton, B., & MacLeod, C.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Notebaert, Lies
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
65
Pages
93-100
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012969272
Cited by
48
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre
  • Australian Research Council (DP140104448, DP140103713)
  • Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research (PNII-ID-PCCE-2011-2-0045)
  • CNCS–UEFISCDI
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
attentional bias modification, dot-probe task, threat-related attention, anxiety, emotional reactivity, emotional vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Behavior Therapy, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review