Cited by 144Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Pooled patient-level meta-analysis of children and adults completing a computer-based anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias

Open access
Price, Rebecca B., Wallace, Meredith, Kuckertz, Jennie M., Amir, Nader, Graur, Simona, Cummings, Logan, Popa, Paul, Carlbring, Per +1 more·2016·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Computer-based approaches, such as Attention Bias Modification (ABM), could help improve access to care for anxiety. Study-level meta-analyses of ABM have produced conflicting findings and leave critical questions unresolved regarding ABM's mechanisms of action and clinical potential. We pooled patient-level datasets from randomized controlled trials of children and adults with high-anxiety. Attentional bias (AB) towards threat, the target mechanism of ABM, was tested as an outcome and a mechanistic mediator and moderator of anxiety reduction. Diagnostic remission and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) were clinical outcomes available in enough studies to enable pooling. Per-patient data were obtained on at least one outcome from 13/16 eligible studies [86% of eligible participants; n=778]. Significant main effects of ABM on diagnostic remission (ABM-22.6%, control-10.8%; OR=2.57; p=0.006) and AB (β* (95%CI)=-0.63 (-0.83, -0.42); p<0.00005) were observed. There was no main effect of ABM on LSAS. However, moderator analyses suggested ABM was effective for patients who were younger (≤37y), trained in the lab, and/or assessed by clinicians. Under the same conditions where ABM was effective, mechanistic links between AB and anxiety reduction were supported. Under these specific circumstances, ABM reduces anxiety and acts through its target mechanism, supporting ABM's theoretical basis while simultaneously suggesting clinical indications and refinements to improve its currently limited clinical potential.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.009

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ABM threat-avoidance training is less effective when delivered at home than in laboratory or clinic settings, possibly because greater distractions at home impair learning.

    “ABM threatavoidance training is less effective when delivered at home than in laboratory/clinic settings, possibly because greater distractions at home impair learning [8,13].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, R. B., Wallace, M., Kuckertz, J. M., Amir, N., Graur, S., Cummings, L., Popa, P., Carlbring, P., & Bar-Haim, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Price, Rebecca B.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
50
Pages
37-49
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2521619673
Cited by
144
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH096944, K23MH100259)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
attentional bias modification, attentional bias, anxiety, computer-based intervention, social anxiety, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, mechanism of action, treatment moderators, children and adults, high anxiety
MeSH terms
Attentional Bias, Adult, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Child, Humans, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review