Cited by 69Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Combining attention training with internet-based cognitive-behavioural self-help for social anxiety: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
Boettcher, Johanna, Hasselrot, Jonas, Sund, Erik, Andersson, Gerhard, Carlbring, Per·2014·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Guided Internet-based cognitive-behavioural self-help (ICBT) has been proven to be effective for social anxiety disorder (SAD) by several independent research groups. However, as the proportion of clinical significant change has room for improvement, new treatments should be developed and investigated. A novel treatment is attention bias modification (ABM). This study aimed at evaluating the combination of ABM and ICBT. We compared two groups, one group receiving ICBT and ABM targeting attentional avoidance and the other group receiving ICBT and control training. ABM and control training tasks were both based on the dot-probe paradigm. A total of 133 participants, diagnosed with SAD, were randomised to these two groups. The attention training group (N = 66) received 2 weeks of daily attention training followed by 9 weeks of ICBT. The control group (N = 67) received 2 weeks of daily control training, also followed by 9 weeks of ICBT. Social anxiety measures as well as the attention bias were assessed at pre-assessment, at week 2, and at post-treatment. Results showed no significant differences between the attention training group and the control group. Both groups improved substantially on social anxiety symptoms from pre- to post-assessment (dwithin = 1.39-1.41), but showed no change in attention processes (dwithin = 0.10-0.17). In this trial, the attention modification training failed to induce differential change in attention bias. Results demonstrate that the applied ABM procedure with its focus on the reduction of attentional avoidance was ineffective in the Internet-based setting. The results do not suggest that adding ABM targeting attentional avoidance to ICBT results in better outcomes than ICBT alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2013.809141

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boettcher, J., Hasselrot, J., Sund, E., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Boettcher, Johanna
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2013-07-30
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
34-48
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2009571619
Cited by
68
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Boettcher Foundation
  • Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, attentional bias modification, attentional avoidance, dot-probe task, combination therapy, attention training, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review