The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ATM-Dependent Chromatin Changes Silence Transcription In cis to DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Open accessAbstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate extensive local and global alterations in chromatin structure, many of which depend on the ATM kinase. Histone H2A ubiquitylation (uH2A) on chromatin surrounding DSBs is one example, thought to be important for recruitment of repair proteins. uH2A is also implicated in transcriptional repression; an intriguing yet untested hypothesis is that this function is conserved in the context of DSBs. Using a novel reporter that allows for visualization of repair protein recruitment and local transcription in single cells, we describe an ATM-dependent transcriptional silencing program in cis to DSBs. ATM prevents RNA polymerase II elongation-dependent chromatin decondensation at regions distal to DSBs. Silencing is partially dependent on E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168, whereas reversal of silencing relies on the uH2A deubiquitylating enzyme USP16. These findings give insight into the role of posttranslational modifications in mediating crosstalk between diverse processes occurring on chromatin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DSBs were previously shown to interfere with the expression of break-proximal genes in tumor cell lines (11–13,42).”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with this, recent findings demonstrate transcriptional repression in cis to DSBs, which depends on DNA damage signaling and ceases after DSB repair is complete (10–13).”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“This work is, however, limited to highly proliferative tumor cell lines, and its implications for animal tissues, which often exhibit little or no proliferation, remain unclear.”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“DSBs are known to promote a dynamic reorganization of break-proximal chromatin, with the potential to affect the expression of both break-proximal and ostensibly undamaged genes (10,13,19,45,48–50).”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“our findings, thus, suggest that most tissues have the potential to restore DSB-induced gene deregulation, although the kinetics of DSB repair and DNA damage-associated gene silencing may differ depending on cell type and/or cell cycle state.”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The latter is in agreement with several reports implicating the DDR mediators ATM and DNA-PK in DSB-proximal repressive chromatin formation as well as transcriptional silencing (9–13,50).”
From Controlled DNA double-strand break induction in mice reveals post-damage transcriptome stability (2016) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139
Rogakou, E. P., Pilch, D. R., Orr, A. H., Ivanova, V. S., & Bonner, W. M. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858 · Cited by 5,438
ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage
Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B. A., Smogorzewska, A., McDonald, E. R., Hurov, K. E., Luo, J., Bakalarski, C. E., Zhao, Z., Solimini, N., Lerenthal, Y., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140321 · Cited by 3,075
DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis
Bartkova, J., Hořejší, Z., Koed, K., Krämer, A., Tort, F., Zieger, K., Guldberg, P., Sehested, M., Nesland, J. M., Lukas, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03482 · Cited by 2,688
Hypomethylation distinguishes genes of some human cancers from their normal counterparts
Feinberg, A. P., & Vogelstein, B. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/301089a0 · Cited by 2,430
Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo
Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 · Cited by 2,422
Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions
Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L.-V. F., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., DiTullio, R. A., Kastrinakis, N. G., Levy, B., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03485 · Cited by 2,009
Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing
Wang, H., Wang, L., Erdjument‐Bromage, H., Vidal, M., Tempst, P., Jones, R. S., & Zhang, Y. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02985 · Cited by 1,856
Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: Reversible repression of Pol II transcription
Gottschling, D. E., Aparicio, O. M., Billington, B. L., & Zakian, V. A. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90141-z · Cited by 1,325
Hickson, I., Zhao, Y., Richardson, C. J., Green, S. J., Martin, N. M. B., Orr, A. I., Reaper, P. M., Jackson, S. P., Curtin, N. J., & Smith, G. C. M. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-2727 · Cited by 1,220
RNF8 Ubiquitylates Histones at DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Promotes Assembly of Repair Proteins
Mailand, N., Bekker‐Jensen, S., Kildegaard, H. F., Melander, F., Bártek, J., Lukas, C., & Lukas, J. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.040 · Cited by 1,193
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019 · Cited by 4,368
ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response
Blackford, A. N., & Jackson, S. P. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.015 · Cited by 2,050
The multifaceted roles of PARP1 in DNA repair and chromatin remodelling
Ray Chaudhuri, A., & Nussenzweig, A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.53 · Cited by 1,786
The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more
Shiloh, Y., & Ziv, Y. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3546 · Cited by 1,649
Playing the End Game: DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathway Choice
Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. G., & Boulton, S. J. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.029 · Cited by 1,726
Chromium in Drinking Water: Sources, Metabolism, and Cancer Risks
Zhitkovich, A. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200251t · Cited by 1,132
Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications
Polo, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2021311 · Cited by 1,092
Small-molecule–induced DNA damage identifies alternative DNA structures in human genes
Rodriguez, R., Miller, K. M., Forment, J. V., Bradshaw, C. R., Nikan, M., Britton, S., Oelschlaegel, T., Xhemalce, B., Balasubramanian, S., & Jackson, S. P. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.780 · Cited by 741
Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks
Aymard, F., Bugler, B., Schmidt, C. K., Guillou, E., Caron, P., Briois, S., Iacovoni, J. S., Daburon, V., Miller, K. M., Jackson, S. P., et al. (2014) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2796 · Cited by 668
RNF168 Ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to Drive DNA Damage Signaling
Mattiroli, F., Vissers, J. H. A., van Dijk, W. J., Ikpa, P. T., Citterio, E., Vermeulen, W., Marteijn, J. A. F., & Sixma, T. K. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.005 · Cited by 688
DNA damage and its links to neurodegeneration
Madabhushi, R., Pan, L., & Tsai, L.-H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.034 · Cited by 654
Lukas, J., Lukas, C., & Bartek, J. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2344 · Cited by 645
Regulation of DNA Damage Responses by Ubiquitin and SUMO
Jackson, S. P., & Durocher, D. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.017 · Cited by 601
Liquid demixing of intrinsically disordered proteins is seeded by poly(ADP-ribose)
Altmeyer, M., Neelsen, K. J., Teloni, F., Pozdnyakova, I., Pellegrino, S., Grøfte, M., Rask, M., Streicher, W. W., Jungmichel, S., Nielsen, M. L., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9088 · Cited by 581
Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination
Tang, J., Cho, N. W., Cui, G., Manion, E. M., Shanbhag, N. M., Botuyan, M. V., Mer, G., & Greenberg, R. A. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2499 · Cited by 521
Self-citationRegulatory R-loops as facilitators of gene expression and genome stability
Niehrs, C., & Luke, B. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0206-3 · Cited by 543
Adriaens, C., Standaert, L., Barra, J., Latil, M., Verfaillie, A., Kalev, P., Boeckx, B., Wijnhoven, P. W. G., Radaelli, E., Vermi, W., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4135 · Cited by 480
Pfister, S. X., Ahrabi, S., Zalmas, L., Sarkar, S., Aymard, F., Bachrati, C. Z., Helleday, T., Legube, G., Thangue, N. B. L., Porter, A. C. G., et al. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.026 · Cited by 496
Modernizing the Nonhomologous End-Joining Repertoire: Alternative and Classical NHEJ Share the Stage
Deriano, L., & Roth, D. B. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155540 · Cited by 496
Moyal, L., Lerenthal, Y., Gana‐Weisz, M., Mass, G., So, S., Wang, S., Eppink, B., Chung, Y. M., Shalev, G., Shema, E., et al. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.015 · Cited by 416
Nuclear DNA damage signalling to mitochondria in ageing
Fang, E. F., Scheibye-Knudsen, M., Chua, K. F., Mattson, M. P., Croteau, D. L., & Bohr, V. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.14 · Cited by 387
Tumor suppressor and deubiquitinase BAP1 promotes DNA double-strand break repair
Yu, H., Pak, H., Hammond-Martel, I., Ghram, M., Rodrigue, A., Daou, S., Barbour, H., Corbeil, L., Hébert, J., Drobetsky, E. A., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1309085110 · Cited by 395
Interchromosomal Homology Searches Drive Directional ALT Telomere Movement and Synapsis
Cho, N. W., Dilley, R. L., Lampson, M. A., & Greenberg, R. A. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.030 · Cited by 385
Self-citation53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair
Zimmermann, M., & de Lange, T. (2013) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.003 · Cited by 387
Thompson, L. H. (2012) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.06.002 · Cited by 357
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers
Schwertman, P., Bekker‐Jensen, S., & Mailand, N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.58 · Cited by 368
Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells
Harrigan, J. A., Belotserkovskaya, R., Coates, J., Dimitrova, D. S., Polo, S. E., Bradshaw, C. R., Fraser, P., & Jackson, S. P. (2011) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201011083 · Cited by 357
Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells
Bekker-Jensen, S., & Mailand, N. (2010) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.010 · Cited by 338
TRIP12 and UBR5 Suppress Spreading of Chromatin Ubiquitylation at Damaged Chromosomes
Guðjόnsson, Þ., Altmeyer, M., Savic, V., Toledo, L. I., Dinant, C., Grøfte, M., Bártková, J., Poulsen, M., Oka, Y., Bekker‐Jensen, S., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.039 · Cited by 347
Senataxin resolves RNA:DNA hybrids forming at DNA double-strand breaks to prevent translocations
Cohen, S., Puget, N., Lin, Y., Clouaire, T., Aguirrebengoa, M., Rocher, V., Pasero, P., Canitrot, Y., & Legube, G. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02894-w · Cited by 338
Proteomic Investigations Reveal a Role for RNA Processing Factor THRAP3 in the DNA Damage Response
Beli, P., Lukashchuk, N., Wagner, S., Weinert, B. T., Olsen, J. V., Baskcomb, L., Mann, M., Jackson, S. P., & Choudhary, C. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.026 · Cited by 344
BRCA1-associated exclusion of 53BP1 from DNA damage sites underlies temporal control of DNA repair
Chapman, J. R., Sossick, A. J., Boulton, S. J., & Jackson, S. P. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.105353 · Cited by 327
Yasuhara, T., Kato, R., Hagiwara, Y., Shiotani, B., Yamauchi, M., Nakada, S., Shibata, A., & Miyagawa, K. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.056 · Cited by 317
Histone Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination in Transcription, DNA Damage Response, and Cancer
Cao, J. P., & Yan, Q. (2012) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2012.00026 · Cited by 350
Goodarzi, A. A., Jeggo, P., & Lobrich, M. (2010) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.013 · Cited by 305
Nuclear Acetyl-CoA Production by ACLY Promotes Homologous Recombination
Sivanand, S., Rhoades, S., Jiang, Q., Lee, J. V., Benci, J., Zhang, J., Yuan, S., Viney, I., Zhao, S., Carrer, A., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.008 · Cited by 295
Self-citationThe same, only different – DNA damage checkpoints and their reversal throughout the cell cycle
Shaltiël, I. A., Krenning, L., Bruinsma, W., & Medema, R. H. (2015) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.163766 · Cited by 310
Kakarougkas, A., Ismail, A., Chambers, A. L., Riballo, E., Herbert, A., Künzel, J., Löbrich, M., Jeggo, P. A., & Downs, J. A. (2014) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.028 · Cited by 301
Adam, S., Polo, S. E., & Almouzni, G. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.029 · Cited by 290
Irianto, J., Xia, Y., Pfeifer, C. R., Athirasala, A., Ji, J., Alvey, C. M., Tewari, M., Bennett, R. R., Harding, S. M., Liu, A. J., et al. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.049 · Cited by 289
Self-citationThe yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection
Costelloe, T., Louge, R., Tomimatsu, N., Mukherjee, B., Martini, E. M.-D., Khadaroo, B., Dubois, K., Wiegant, W. W., Thierry, A., Burma, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11353 · Cited by 275
DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation
Sirbu, B. M., & Cortez, D. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012724 · Cited by 272
Functional characterization of the TERRA transcriptome at damaged telomeres
Porro, A., Feuerhahn, S., Delafontaine, J., Riethman, H. C., Rougemont, J., & Lingner, J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6379 · Cited by 289
Jiang, H., Xue, X., Panda, S., Kawale, A. S., Hooy, R. M., Liang, F., Sohn, J., Sung, P., & Gekara, N. O. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019102718 · Cited by 270
DNA damage-induced type I interferon promotes senescence and inhibits stem cell function
Yu, Q., Katlinskaya, Y. V., Carbone, C. J., Zhao, B., Katlinski, K. V., Zheng, H., Guha, M., Li, N., Chen, Q., Yang, T., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.069 · Cited by 260
Self-citationBeyond DNA Repair: DNA-PK Function in Cancer
Goodwin, J. F., & Knudsen, K. E. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0358 · Cited by 258
BMI1 Is Recruited to DNA Breaks and Contributes to DNA Damage-Induced H2A Ubiquitination and Repair
Ginjala, V., Nacerddine, K., Kulkarni, A., Oza, J., Hill, S. J., Yao, M., Citterio, E., van Lohuizen, M., & Ganesan, S. (2011) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00981-10 · Cited by 240
Double strand break repair functions of histone H2AX
Scully, R., & Xie, A. (2013) · Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.007 · Cited by 277
Histone methylation and the DNA damage response
Gong, F., & Miller, K. M. (2017) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.09.003 · Cited by 263
DNAPKcs-dependent arrest of RNA polymerase II transcription in the presence of DNA breaks
Pankotai, T., Bonhomme, C., Chen, D., & Soutoglou, E. (2012) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2224 · Cited by 239
Gong, F., Chiu, L.-Y., Cox, B., Aymard, F., Clouaire, T., Leung, J. W., Cammarata, M., Perez, M., Agarwal, P., Brodbelt, J. S., et al. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.252189.114 · Cited by 247
Causes and consequences of RNA polymerase II stalling during transcript elongation
González, M. N., Blears, D., & Svejstrup, J. Q. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00308-8 · Cited by 254
Chromatin and the genome integrity network
Papamichos‐Chronakis, M., & Peterson, C. L. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3345 · Cited by 257
Walking a tightrope: The complex balancing act of R-loops in genome stability
Brickner, J. R., Garzon, J. L., & Cimprich, K. A. (2022) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.014 · Cited by 256
Crosstalk between chromatin state and DNA damage response in cellular senescence and cancer.
Sulli, G., Di Micco, R., & di Fagagna, F. D. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3344 · Cited by 238
Early neuronal accumulation of DNA double strand breaks in Alzheimer’s disease
Shanbhag, N. M., Evans, M. D., Mao, W., Nana, A. L., Seeley, W. W., Adame, A., Rissman, R. A., Masliah, E., & Mucke, L. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0723-5 · Cited by 214
Self-citationThe Repair and Signaling Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks
Goodarzi, A. A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2013) · Advances in genetics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407676-1.00001-9 · Cited by 245
The ubiquitous role of ubiquitin in the DNA damage response
Al-Hakim, A., Escribano‐Diaz, C., Landry, M.-C., O’Donnell, L., Panier, S., Szilard, R. K., & Durocher, D. (2010) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.011 · Cited by 240
The BRCA1-RAP80 Complex Regulates DNA Repair Mechanism Utilization by Restricting End Resection
Coleman, K. A., & Greenberg, R. A. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.213728 · Cited by 234
Self-citationA Macrohistone Variant Links Dynamic Chromatin Compaction to BRCA1-Dependent Genome Maintenance
Khurana, S., Kruhlak, M. J., Kim, J., Tran, A. D., Liu, J., Nyswaner, K., Shi, L., Jailwala, P., Sung, M.-H., Hakim, O., et al. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.024 · Cited by 220
DNA double-strand breaks induce H2Ax phosphorylation domains in a contact-dependent manner
Collins, P. L., Purman, C. E., Porter, S. I., Nganga, V. K., Saini, A., Hayer, K. E., Gurewitz, G. L., Sleckman, B. P., Bednarski, J. J., Bassing, C. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16926-x · Cited by 231
Germline Mutations in BAP1 Impair Its Function in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Ismail, I. H., Davidson, R., Gagné, J., Xu, Z. Z., Poirier, G. G., & Hendzel, M. J. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3109 · Cited by 230
Histone ubiquitination in the DNA damage response
Uckelmann, M., & Sixma, T. K. (2017) · DNA repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.011 · Cited by 222
Activation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin
Burgess, R. C., Burman, B., Kruhlak, M. J., & Misteli, T. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.060 · Cited by 198
Cremona, C. A., & Behrens, A. (2013) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2013.275 · Cited by 219
Chromosomal Contact Permits Transcription between Coregulated Genes
Fanucchi, S., Shibayama, Y., Burd, S. C., Weinberg, M. S., & Mhlanga, M. M. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.051 · Cited by 216
Dual Roles of Poly(dA:dT) Tracts in Replication Initiation and Fork Collapse
Tubbs, A., Sridharan, S., van Wietmarschen, N., Maman, Y., Callén, E., Stanlie, A., Wu, W., Wu, X., Day, A., Wong, N., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.011 · Cited by 196
Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response
Dantuma, N. P., & van Attikum, H. (2015) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201592595 · Cited by 208
Xia, L., Huang, W., Bellani, M. A., Seidman, M. M., Wu, K., Fan, D., Nie, Y., Cai, Y., Zhang, Y. W., Yu, L., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.04.005 · Cited by 203
MDC1 directs chromosome-wide silencing of the sex chromosomes in male germ cellsPreprint
Ichijima, Y., Ichijima, M., Lou, Z., Nussenzweig, A., Camerini‐Otero, R. D., Chen, J., Andreassen, P. R., & Namekawa, S. H. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.2030811 · Cited by 200
Britton, S., Dernoncourt, E., Delteil, C., Froment, C., Burlet‐Schiltz, O., Salles, B., Frit, P., & Calsou, P. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku601 · Cited by 185
ATM Dependent Silencing Links Nucleolar Chromatin Reorganization to DNA Damage Recognition
Harding, S. M., Boiarsky, J., & Greenberg, R. A. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.085 · Cited by 197
Self-citationMutations, kataegis and translocations in B cells: understanding AID promiscuous activity
Casellas, R. C., Basu, U., Yewdell, W. T., Chaudhuri, J., Robbiani, D. F., & Noia, J. M. D. (2016) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.2 · Cited by 182
Mersaoui, S. Y., Yu, Z., Coulombe, Y., Karam, M., Busatto, F. F., Masson, J., & Richard, S. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2018100986 · Cited by 186
Polo, S. E., Blackford, A. N., Chapman, J. R., Baskcomb, L., Gravel, S., Rusch, A., Thomas, A., Blundred, R., Smith, P., Kzhyshkowska, J. G., et al. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.035 · Cited by 193
C9orf72 expansion disrupts ATM-mediated chromosomal break repair
Walker, C., Herranz-Martín, S., Karyka, E., Liao, C., Lewis, K. E. A., Elsayed, W., Lukashchuk, V., Chiang, S., Ray, S., Mulcahy, P. J., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4604 · Cited by 194
m5C modification of mRNA serves a DNA damage code to promote homologous recombination
Chen, H., Yang, H., Zhu, X., Yadav, T., Ouyang, J., Truesdell, S. S., Tan, J. J., Wang, Y., Duan, M.-H., Wei, L., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16722-7 · Cited by 189
The caspase‐activated DN ase: apoptosis and beyond
Larsen, B. D., & Sørensen, C. S. (2016) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13970 · Cited by 180
Epigenetic Modifications in Double-Strand Break DNA Damage Signaling and Repair
Rossetto, D., Truman, A. W., Kron, S. J., & Côté, J. (2010) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-0513 · Cited by 183
R-loops as Janus-faced modulators of DNA repair
Marnef, A., & Legube, G. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-021-00663-4 · Cited by 170
The NBS1–Treacle complex controls ribosomal RNA transcription in response to DNA damage
Larsen, D. H., Hari, F. J., Clapperton, J. A., Gwerder, M., Gutsche, K., Altmeyer, M., Jungmichel, S., Toledo, L. I., Fink, D. A., Rask, M., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3007 · Cited by 180
The ATM signaling network in development and disease
Stracker, T. H., Roig, I., Knobel, P. A., & Marjanović, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00037 · Cited by 192
Clarke, T. L., Sánchez-Bailón, M. P., Chiang, K., Reynolds, J. J., Herrero‐Ruiz, J., Bandeiras, T. M., Matias, P. M., Maslen, S., Skehel, M. J., Stewart, G. S., et al. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.019 · Cited by 178
Push back to respond better: regulatory inhibition of the DNA double-strand break response
Panier, S., & Durocher, D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3659 · Cited by 177
Growing old, yet staying young: The role of telomeres in bats’ exceptional longevity
Foley, N. M., Hughes, G. M., Huang, Z., Clarke, M., Jebb, D., Whelan, C., PETIT, E. J., Touzalin, F., Farcy, O., Jones, G., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao0926 · Cited by 187
RNA transcripts stimulate homologous recombination by forming DR-loops
Ouyang, J., Yadav, T., Zhang, J., Yang, H., Rheinbay, E., Guo, H., Haber, D. A., Lan, L., & Zou, L. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03538-8 · Cited by 166
Yang, H., Wang, Y., Xiang, Y., Yadav, T., Ouyang, J., Phoon, L. Y., Zhu, X., Shi, Y., Zou, L., & Lan, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2116251119 · Cited by 166
Krietsch, J., Caron, M., Gagné, J., Ethier, C., Vignard, J., Vincent, M., Rouleau, M., Hendzel, M. J., Poirier, G. G., & Masson, J. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks798 · Cited by 166
The proteasomal de‐ubiquitinating enzyme POH1 promotes the double‐strand DNA break response
Butler, L. R., Densham, R. M., Jia, J., Garvin, A. J., Stone, H. R., Shah, V., Weekes, D. B., Festy, F., Beesley, J. F. J., & Morris, J. R. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.232 · Cited by 168
Ui, A., Nagaura, Y., & Yasui, A. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.023 · Cited by 169
A Critical Balance: dNTPs and the Maintenance of Genome Stability
Pai, C., & Kearsey, S. E. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8020057 · Cited by 169
Polycomb group-mediated histone H2A monoubiquitination in epigenome regulation and nuclear processes
Barbour, H., Daou, S., Hendzel, M. J., & Affar, E. B. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19722-9 · Cited by 170
DNA Double-strand Break Repair in a Cellular Context
Shibata, A., & Jeggo, P. A. (2014) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2014.02.004 · Cited by 158
Histone H4 deacetylation facilitates 53BP1 DNA damage signaling and double-strand break repair
Hsiao, K., & Mizzen, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1093/jmcb/mjs066 · Cited by 165
ATM-Dependent Phosphorylation of All Three Members of the MRN Complex: From Sensor to Adaptor
Lavin, M. F., Kozlov, S., Gatei, M. H., & Kijas, A. W. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5042877 · Cited by 164
The RNA Splicing Response to DNA Damage
Shkreta, L., & Chabot, B. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5042935 · Cited by 156
Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repair: An Ever-Growing Toolbox
Vítor, A. C., Huertas, P., Legube, G., & de Almeida, S. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00024 · Cited by 162
Biallelic Deleterious BRCA1 Mutations in a Woman with Early-Onset Ovarian Cancer
Domchek, S. M., Tang, J.-B., Stopfer, J. E., Lilli, D. R., Hamel, N., Tischkowitz, M. D., Monteiro, Á. N. A., Messick, T. E., Powers, J., Yonker, A., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0421 · Cited by 152
Self-citationUbiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response
Brown, J. S., & Jackson, S. P. (2015) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.150018 · Cited by 155
Trojer, P., Cao, A. R., Gao, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Xu, X., Li, G., Losson, R., Erdjument‐Bromage, H., Tempst, P., et al. (2011) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.004 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Shanbhag, N. M., Rafalska-Metcalf, I. U., Balane-Bolivar, C., Janicki, S. M., & Greenberg, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Abramson Cancer Center (US)
- The Wistar Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greenberg, Roger A.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 970-981
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2920610
- OpenAlex
- W2135144687
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 1142 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Genentech
- National Cancer Institute (K08CA106597, T32CA115299, R01CA138835, 1-T32-CA-115299-01A2)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- ATM kinase, DNA double-strand breaks, transcriptional silencing, chromatin decondensation, RNA polymerase II elongation, RNF8, RNF168, USP16, E3 ubiquitin ligase, post-translational modification
- MeSH terms
- Chromatin, DNA Damage, DNA-Binding Proteins, Histones, Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Gene Silencing, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase, Cell Line, Tumor, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Ubiquitination, Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
