Cited by 345Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceSirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 99 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Search for Antiaging Interventions: From Elixirs to Fasting Regimens

Open access
de Cabo, Rafael, Carmona-Gutierrez, Didac, Bernier, Michel, Hall, Michael N., Madeo, Frank·2014·Cell

Abstract

The phenomenon of aging is an intrinsic feature of life. Accordingly, the possibility to manipulate it has fascinated humans likely since time immemorial. Recent evidence is shaping a picture where low caloric regimes and exercise may improve healthy senescence, and several pharmacological strategies have been suggested to counteract aging. Surprisingly, the most effective interventions proposed to date converge on only a few cellular processes, in particular nutrient signaling, mitochondrial efficiency, proteostasis, and autophagy. Here, we critically examine drugs and behaviors to which life- or healthspan-extending properties have been ascribed and discuss the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review critically examines behavioral and pharmacological antiaging interventions that meet stringent criteria of healthspan/lifespan extension, validation in at least three model organisms, and confirmation by at least three laboratories. It concludes that the most effective interventions converge on nutrient signaling, mitochondrial efficiency, proteostasis, autophagy, and stress resistance, while human applicability remains uncertain.

Key findings

  • Caloric restriction (CR) extends mean and maximum lifespan in dogs, rodents, worms, flies, yeasts, and prokaryotes; in rodents, moderate CR (8%) affects median but not maximal lifespan, whereas more severe CR (30%) increases lifespan by up to 50%. In humans, CR of around 15% may be most favorable against mortality during aging, but prolonged severe CR is linked to side effects including decreased fertility, wound healing problems, amenorrhea, osteoporosis, and reduced infection resistance.
  • Fasting regimens show antiaging and healthspan effects: rats on alternate-day fasting live up to 83% longer than normally fed counterparts, and a 24-hour fast every 4 days is sufficient to promote significant lifespan extension; a 5-day fast lowers IGF1 plasma levels by more than 60%. A two-week medically supervised water-only fast resulted in blood pressure below 120/80 mm Hg in 82% of subjects with borderline hypertension, and 10 days of water-only fasting normalized blood pressure in all hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive medication.
  • Pharmacological candidates include rapamycin, resveratrol, spermidine, and metformin. Rapamycin extends lifespan in yeast, flies, worms, and mice; resveratrol prolongs lifespan of mice on a high-fat diet or fed every other day but not mice on regular chow; spermidine triggers autophagy and extends lifespan in yeast, flies, and worms; metformin increases mean and maximum lifespan in different female mouse strains predisposed to high mammary tumor incidence.
  • Common molecular denominators include insulin/IGF1/TOR signaling, autophagy, hormesis, and mitochondrial function; autophagy induction, improved stress resistance, and mitochondrial efficiency are proposed as key cellular functions needed to delay aging features such as free radical generation, excess caloric intake, chronic hyperglycemia, and fat accumulation.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review that considers only pharmacological interventions, regimens, and genetic manipulations meeting three selective criteria: promotion of healthspan and/or life extension, validation in at least three model organisms, and confirmation by at least three different laboratories.
  • Data/sample: literature on fasting regimens, caloric restriction, exercise, and low-molecular-weight compounds including spermidine, metformin, resveratrol, and rapamycin, with evidence from yeast, worms, flies, rodents, non-human primates, and humans.
  • Main analysis: critical evaluation of proposed antiaging interventions and their underlying molecular mechanisms, including epigenetic mechanisms, insulin/TOR and Ras signaling, mitochondrial function, proteostasis, autophagy, and stress resistance.

Limitations

  • The paper states that only a few proposed aging interventions met its stringent criteria, that aging research has relatively low reproducibility because aging is a long-lasting process prone to artifacts, and that some inconsistencies arise from over-interpretation of lifespan-shortening scenarios.
  • The paper states that CR studies in non-human primates produced different outcomes, that human applicability of these interventions remains unclear, and that more research is needed on long-term effects alone and in combination.
  • Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a described systematic search or meta-analysis, and it reports no new experimental data; its 2014 publication date also means later evidence is not included.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.031

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 99 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 63 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 40
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from model organisms about lifespan or healthspan extension can be extrapolated to humans.

    “There are only a few proposed aging interventions that have met such stringent criteria: fasting regimens, caloric restriction, exercise, and the use of low molecular weight compounds, including spermidine, metformin, resveratrol and rapamycin (Table 1).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The three criteria used to select interventions (healthspan/life extension, validation in at least three model organisms, and confirmation by at least three different laboratories) are sufficient to identify reliable anti-aging interventions.

    “the present review considers only pharmacological interventions, regimens and genetic manipulations that meet three highly selective criteria: (i) promotion of healthspan and/or life extension; (ii) validation in at least three model organisms; and (iii) confirmation by at least three different laboratories.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Long-term administration of rapamycin causes adverse health effects in patients, including impaired wound healing, anemia, proteinuria, pneumonitis, and hypercholesterolemia.

    “Moreover, long-term administration of rapamycin has been found to cause a variety of adverse health effects in patients, including impaired wound healing, anemia, proteinuria, pneumonitis, and hypercholesterolemia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from model organisms about lifespan extension are informative about human aging and antiaging interventions.

    “Rapamycin is a strong inducer of autophagy and it extends lifespan in all organisms tested so far, including yeast, flies, worms and mice (Bjedov and Partridge, 2011; Kapahi et al., 2004).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CR is a strong inducer of autophagy.

    “CR is a strong inducer of autophagy, which may be an efficient strategy to maintain life under times of scarce resources.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 124 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
de Cabo, R., Carmona-Gutierrez, D., Bernier, M., Hall, M. N., & Madeo, F.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Madeo, Frank
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
157
Issue
7
Pages
1515-1526
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037782139
Cited by
345
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (ZIAAG000368)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine
Keywords
healthy aging, lifespan extension, healthspan, caloric restriction, physical activity, nutrient signaling, mitochondrial efficiency, proteostasis, autophagy
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Antioxidants, Autophagy, Diet, Humans, Longevity, Signal Transduction, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review