Cited by 144Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly

Open access
Kirschner, Paul A., Ayres, Paul, Chandler, Paul·2011·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.025

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirschner, P. A., Ayres, P., & Chandler, P.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Kirschner, Paul A.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
99-105
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160073399
Cited by
144
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
cognitive load theory, cognitive load assessment, learning and instruction, instructional design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review