Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes

Open access
Kruikemeier, Sanne·2014·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Adam, 2010, Personalization of politics: A critical review and agenda for research, 213
  2. Blumler, 2001, The new media and our political communication discontents: Democratizing cyberspace, Information, Communication & Society, 4, 1, 10.1080/713768514 · doi:10.1080/713768514
  3. Boulianne, 2009, Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research, Political Communication, 26, 193, 10.1080/10584600902854363 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In Paper Presented on the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System, Science (pp. 1–10). · DOI · Paper page
  5. D’Alessio, 1997, Use of the world wide web in the 1996 US election, Electoral Studies, 16, 489, 10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00044-9 · DOI
  6. Druckman, 2003, The power of television images: The first Kennedy-Nixon debate revisited, Journal of Politics, 65, 559, 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fortin, 2005, Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement, Journal of Business Research, 58, 387, 10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gibson, 2006, Does cyber-campaigning win votes? Online communication in the 2004 Australian election, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 16, 243, 10.1080/13689880600950527 · DOI
  9. Gibson, 2011, Do online election campaigns win votes? the 2007 australian “YouTube” election, Political Communication, 28, 227, 10.1080/10584609.2011.568042 · DOI
  10. Golbeck, 2010, Twitter use by the US congress, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1612, 10.1002/asi.21344 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Huber, 2007, Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising, American Journal of Political Science, 51, 957, 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00291.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kenski, 2006, Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173, 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kleinnijenhuis, 2001, Issues and personalities in German and Dutch television news, European Journal of Communication, 16, 337, 10.1177/0267323101016003003 · doi:10.1177/0267323101016003003
  14. Kruikemeier, 2013, Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication, European Journal of Communication, 28, 53, 10.1177/0267323112464837 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lee, 2012, To personalize or depersonalize? when and how politicians' personalized tweets affect the public's reactions, Journal of Communication, 62, 932, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01681.x · DOI
  16. Lee, 2012, Are they talking to me? Cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians’ twitter communication, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 515, 10.1089/cyber.2012.0228 · DOI
  17. Lilleker, 2011, Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning, European Journal of Communication, 26, 195, 10.1177/0267323111416182 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Liu, 2002, What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness, Journal of Advertising, 31, 53, 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lovejoy, 2012, Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less, Public Relations Review, 38, 313, 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Park, 2008, Do campaign web sites really matter in electoral civic engagement? Empirical evidence from the 2004 post-election internet tracking survey, Social Science Computer Review, 26, 190, 10.1177/0894439307309026 · DOI
  21. Rackaway, 2007, Trickle-down technology? The use of computing and network technology in state legislative campaigns, Social Science Computer Review, 25, 466, 10.1177/0894439307305625 · doi:10.1177/0894439307305625
  22. Rahat, 2007, The personalization (s) of politics: Israel, 1949–2003, Political Communication, 24, 65, 10.1080/10584600601128739 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Rosenberg, 1986, The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference, American Journal of Political Science, 1, 108, 10.2307/2111296 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Shah, 2005, Information and expression in a digital age, Communication Research, 32, 531, 10.1177/0093650205279209 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Small, 2011, What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on twitter, Information, Communication & Society, 14, 872, 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Stromer-Galley, 2002, Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00161.x · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00161.x
  27. Sundar, 2003, Explicating web site interactivity, Communication Research, 30, 30, 10.1177/0093650202239025 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Tanis, 2003, Social cues and impression formation in CMC, Journal of Communication, 53, 676, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02917.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02917.x · Paper page
  29. Tedesco, 2007, Examining internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy, American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1183, 10.1177/0002764207300041 · DOI
  30. Trammell, 2006, Evolution of online campaigning: Increasing interactivity in candidate web sites and blogs through text and technical features, Mass Communication & Society, 9, 21, 10.1207/s15327825mcs0901_2 · DOI
  31. Tumasjan, 2010, Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment, Proceedings of the Fourth International Aaai Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 178, 10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14009 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Utz, 2009, The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 221, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01438.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Van Holsteyn, 2010, Demoted leaders and exiled candidates: Disentangling party and person in the voter’s mind, Electoral Studies, 29, 628, 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.003 · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.003
  34. Van Santen, 2010, The personal in political television biographies, Biography, 33, 46, 10.1353/bio.0.0157 · DOI
  35. Vliegenthart, 2010, Res Publica, 52, 315, 10.5553/RP/048647002010052003003 · doi:10.5553/rp/048647002010052003003
  36. Wagner, 2009, Electronic grassroots: Does online campaigning work?, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15, 502, 10.1080/13572330903302539 · DOI
  37. Wang, 2007, Political use of the internet, political attitudes and political participation, Asian Journal of Communication, 17, 381, 10.1080/01292980701636993 · DOI
  38. Warnick, 2005, Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00253.x · DOI
  39. Wauters, 2010, Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: An investigation of the 2003 federal elections in flanders (Belgium), Acta Politica, 45, 468, 10.1057/ap.2010.6 · doi:10.1057/ap.2010.6

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Kruikemeier, S.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
34
Pages
131-139
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
OpenAlex
W1971171843
Cited by
315
References
1
FWCI
58.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025
The paper
Kruikemeier, S. (2014). How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.