Cited by 82Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and Behaviors

Effects of Social Media and Smartphone Use on Body Esteem in Female Adolescents: Testing a Cognitive and Affective Model

Open access
Yang, Hwajin, Wang, Joy Jiaqi, Tng, Germaine Y. Q., Yang, Sujin·2020·Children

Abstract

We examined the predictive relations of social media and smartphone use to body esteem in female adolescents and the mechanism that underlies these relations. As a result of frequent social media and smartphone use, adolescents are continually exposed to appearance-related media content. This likely reinforces a thin ideal and fosters appearance-based comparison and increases fear of external evaluation. Hence, we investigated a cognitive-affective framework in which the associations of social media and smartphone use with body esteem are serially mediated by cognitive internalization of an ideal body image, appearance comparisons, and social appearance anxiety. By testing female adolescents (N = 100) aged 13 to 18, we found that excessive social media use leads to unhealthy body esteem via intensified cognitive internalization, which aggravates appearance comparisons and anxiety regarding negative appearance evaluation. Further, we found that screen time for specific smartphone activities also harmed body esteem, independent of social media use. However, overall smartphone screen time did not affect body esteem when social media use was taken into consideration. Our findings underscore the multifactor mechanism that elucidates the negative impacts of social media and smartphone activities on body esteem in female adolescents, who are developmentally susceptible to poor body esteem.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In 100 female adolescents aged 13–18, excessive social media use (>3 h/day) predicted lower body esteem through serial cognitive-affective mediators: thin-ideal internalization, appearance comparison, and social appearance anxiety. Overall smartphone screen time lost its indirect effect when social media use was controlled, but some specific smartphone activities (browsing websites, listening to music, watching TV shows) remained indirectly associated with poorer body esteem.

Key findings

  • Heavy social media use (>3 h/day vs. nonuse) had a significant relative indirect effect on body esteem via internalization, appearance comparison, and social appearance anxiety (B = −0.058, SE = 0.032, 95% CI [−0.131, −0.008]); the direct effect was not significant, indicating full serial mediation.
  • The serial path was: social media use → cognitive internalization (B = 0.623, SE = 0.204, p = 0.003) → appearance comparison (B = 1.464, SE = 0.159, p < 0.001) → social appearance anxiety (B = 0.141, SE = 0.050, p = 0.006) → lower body esteem (B = −0.291, SE = 0.057, p < 0.001).
  • Overall smartphone use >4 h/day showed a significant indirect effect on body esteem (B = −0.044, SE = 0.027, 95% CI [−0.106, −0.001]), but this became nonsignificant when social media screen time was controlled (B = −0.013, SE = 0.012, 95% CI [−0.041, 0.009]).
  • Specific smartphone activities that remained significant after controlling for social media use were browsing websites (B = −0.029, SE = 0.018, 95% CI [−0.069, −0.001]), listening to music (B = −0.028, SE = 0.019, 95% CI [−0.070, −0.001]), and watching TV shows (B = −0.031, SE = 0.017, 95% CI [−0.067, −0.003]); photography and online shopping were not significant.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional self-report study of 100 female adolescents aged 13–18 (Mage = 15.07, SD = 1.33), recruited from a local community for a $5 monetary reward; 60% Chinese, 18% Malay, 9% Indian, 13% Other.
  • Measures included social media use, overall and specific smartphone screen time, cognitive internalization (SATAQ-3), appearance comparison (PACS-R), social appearance anxiety (SAAS), body esteem (BESAA), weight locus of control, and demographics; covariates were age, household income, BMI, and internal locus of control.
  • Serial mediation analyses used the PROCESS macro in SPSS with contrast coding for categorical screen-time variables, 95% confidence intervals based on 5,000 bootstrap samples, and tests of relative indirect effects.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the correlational design cannot establish causality or temporal ordering among mediators, and reverse causation is possible (e.g., lower body esteem may drive social media use for validation).
  • The paper states that screen time was self-reported and categorical, subject to memory and social-desirability bias; it could not quantify appearance-related exposure or disentangle multitasking, and actual time spent on each activity may be overestimated.
  • The paper states the sample was limited to female adolescents and did not control for time of year; evident limitations include the small N = 100 and single local community sample, which restrict generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/children7090148

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Cognitive internalization then escalated engagement in appearance comparison (B = 1.422, SE = 0.151, p < 0.001).

    “which then escalated their engagement in appearance comparison (B = 1.422, SE = 0.151, p < 0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Appearance comparison subsequently increased social appearance anxiety (B = 0.142, SE = 0.049, p = 0.005).

    “and, subsequently, social appearance anxiety (B = 0.142, SE = 0.049, p = 0.005)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Social appearance anxiety worsened body esteem (B = −0.291, SE = 0.057, p < 0.001).

    “which in turn worsened body esteem (B = −0.291, SE = 0.057, p < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Heavy smartphone screen time of more than 4 h indirectly influenced body esteem via cognitive internalization and engagement in comparison behaviors (B = −0.137, SE = 0.075, 95% CI [−0.299, −0.012]).

    “our analyses of nested models revealed two significant serial mediation models in which heavy smartphone screen time of more than 4 h indirectly influenced body esteem via (a) cognitive internalization and engagement in comparison behaviors (B = −0.137, SE = 0.075, 95% CI [−0.299, −0.012])”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Excessive smartphone use significantly strengthened cognitive internalization of an ideal body image (B = 0.455, SE = 0.232, p = 0.05).

    “excessive smartphone use significantly strengthened cognitive internalization of an ideal body image (B = 0.455, SE = 0.232, p = 0.05)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Internalization of thin ideals and appearance comparisons mediated the effect of appearance exposure via media consumption on poor body image outcomes.

    “Tiggemann and Miller [10] found that internalization of thin ideals and appearance comparisons mediated the effect of appearance exposure via media consumption (i.e., the internet and magazines) on poor body image outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Tiggemann, 2010, The Internet and Adolescent Girls’ Weight Satisfaction and Drive for Thinness, Sex Roles source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Social appearance anxiety negatively influences the evaluation of one's body, as reflected in greater body dissatisfaction, unhealthy eating attitudes, and eating pathology symptoms.

    “Levinson and Rodebaugh [53], found that social appearance anxiety negatively influences the evaluation of one’s body, as reflected in greater body dissatisfaction, unhealthy eating attitudes, and eating pathology symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [53] Levinson, 2012, Social anxiety and eating disorder comorbidity: The role of negative social evaluation fears, Eat. Behav. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Baseline internalization of media-induced ideals longitudinally predicted social appearance comparison in adolescent females.

    “Rodgers, McLean, and Paxton [44] found that baseline internalization of media-induced ideals longitudinally predicted social appearance comparison in adolescent females.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Rodgers, 2015, Longitudinal relationships among internalization of the media ideal, peer social comparison, and body dissatisfaction: Implications for the tripartite influence model, Dev. Psychol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that females are likely to experience moderate to sharp declines in body esteem around the ages of 10 to 13 years, but their body esteem stabilizes by age 20.

    “longitudinal studies have demonstrated that females are likely to experience moderate to sharp declines in body esteem around the ages of 10 to 13 years, but their body esteem stabilizes by age 20 [22,23].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Lunde, 2007, Ten-year-old girls’ and boys’ body composition and peer victimization experiences: Prospective associations with body satisfaction, Body Image source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] Nelson, 2018, Identity and the body: Trajectories of body esteem from adolescence to emerging adulthood, Dev. Psychol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Concerns about others' negative appearance-based evaluation play a crucial role in determining body-related self-worth, which can outweigh one's own judgments of her body.

    “As Davison and McCabe [35] have shown, concerns about others’ negative appearance-based evaluation play a crucial role in determining body-related self-worth, which can outweigh one’s own judgments of her body.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Davison, 2006, Adolescent Body Image and Psychosocial Functioning, J. Soc. Psychol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Peer appearance comparisons fully mediated the effects of social media activities (photo browsing and editing on Instagram) on body esteem.

    “Chang et al. [27] demonstrated that peer appearance comparisons fully mediated the effects of social media activities (i.e., photo browsing and editing on Instagram) on body esteem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Chang, 2019, A study of Singapore adolescent girls’ selfie practices, peer appearance comparisons, and body esteem on Instagram, Body Image source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Excessive social media use (more than 3 h daily) leads to poorer body esteem in female adolescents via serial mediation through cognitive internalization of thin ideals, appearance comparisons, and social appearance anxiety.

    “we found that excessive social media use leads to unhealthy body esteem via intensified cognitive internalization, which aggravates appearance comparisons and anxiety regarding negative appearance evaluation.”
    • Also stated in: § 4.1. Social Media Screen Time · hedged
      “These results suggest that only excessive social media use (more than 3 h daily) gives rise to poorer body esteem outcomes in female adolescents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cross-sectional serial mediation model can support causal inferences about the direction of effects from social media/smartphone use to body esteem.
    • Rests on an assumption: The serial ordering of mediators (cognitive internalization → appearance comparison → social appearance anxiety → body esteem) is the correct causal order.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social media use and appearance-related exposure to the internet reinforce the internalization of thin ideals, which in turn promotes body dissatisfaction.

    “previous studies suggest that social media use [26,29] and appearance-related exposure to the internet [10] reinforce the internalization of thin ideals, which would in turn promote body dissatisfaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [26] Meier, 2014, Facebook Photo Activity Associated with Body Image Disturbance in Adolescent Girls, Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Rodgers, 2020, A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys, J. Youth Adolesc. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Tiggemann, 2010, The Internet and Adolescent Girls’ Weight Satisfaction and Drive for Thinness, Sex Roles source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Premisecitation

    Internalization of thin ideals and appearance comparison mediate the association of social media use with body dissatisfaction in adolescents.

    “Rodgers et al. [29] propose a biopsychosocial model in which the internalization of thin ideals and appearance comparison mediate the association of social media use with body dissatisfaction in adolescents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Rodgers, 2020, A Biopsychosocial Model of Social Media Use and Body Image Concerns, Disordered Eating, and Muscle-Building Behaviors among Adolescent Girls and Boys, J. Youth Adolesc. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adolescent girls are considerably more prone to negative body evaluations and heightened self-consciousness about others' evaluations of their bodies than adolescent boys.

    “cross-sectional studies have shown that adolescent girls are considerably more prone to negative body evaluations and heightened self-consciousness about others’ evaluations of their bodies than adolescent boys [35].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Davison, 2006, Adolescent Body Image and Psychosocial Functioning, J. Soc. Psychol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Female adolescents are more likely to compare their bodies to others and engage in appearance-focused conversations or commentary than their male counterparts, which, in turn, engender poorer body esteem.

    “female adolescents are more likely to compare their bodies to others and engage in appearance-focused conversations or commentary than their male counterparts, which, in turn, engender poorer body esteem [22,36].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] Lunde, 2007, Ten-year-old girls’ and boys’ body composition and peer victimization experiences: Prospective associations with body satisfaction, Body Image source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] Jones, 2001, Social Comparison and Body Image: Attractiveness Comparisons to Models and Peers among Adolescent Girls and Boys, Sex Roles source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Reverse causation is possible such that individuals who suffer from lower body esteem may use social media and smartphones to seek external validation and assurance.

    “Although we posit that social media and smartphone use leads to poorer body esteem, reverse causation is still possible such that individuals who suffer from lower body esteem may use social media and smartphones to seek external validation and assurance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Smartphone and social media screen time was assessed by self-report measures (with categorical responses), which are subject to potential memory errors or social desirability bias.

    “Second, given that smartphone and social media screen time was assessed by self-report measures (with categorical responses), which are subject to potential memory errors or social desirability bias, future studies should replicate our findings by using an objective measure that quantifies screen time in a continuous and more precise fashion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The findings are silent regarding the specific extent of appearance-related exposure implicated in the identified smartphone activities.

    “Third, although we identified specific smartphone activities (browsing websites, listening to music, and watching TV shows) that indirectly impact body esteem above and beyond social media use, our findings are still silent regarding the specific extent of appearance-related exposure implicated in those activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Collinearity statistics did not show any evidence of multicollinearity.

    “Collinearity statistics did not show any evidence of multicollinearity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social media use likely influences not only one's online networking but also real-world social exchanges.

    “Further, given that social media activities largely center on appearance-focused interactions with one’s social network (e.g., sharing and giving feedback on posted content), social media use likely influences not only one’s online networking but also real-world social exchanges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media activities largely center on appearance-focused interactions with one’s social network.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Cognitive internalization of ideal body standards plays a central role in enacting upward appearance comparison and social appearance anxiety, which subsequently leads to unhealthy body esteem.

    “Our results from nested mediation models call attention to the central role of cognitive internalization of ideal body standards in enacting upward appearance comparison and social appearance anxiety, which subsequently leads to unhealthy body esteem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The social appearance anxiety scale demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.94).

    “Good internal consistency was demonstrated (α = 0.94) [57].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] Claes, 2012, Validation of the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale in Female Eating Disorder Patients, Eur. Eat. Disord. Rev. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    In all analyses, the authors controlled for key covariates of age, income, body mass index (BMI), and internal locus of control over one's body.

    “In all analyses, we controlled for key covariates of age, income, body mass index (BMI), and internal locus of control over one’s body”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adolescents have limited access and exposure to appearance-highlighting content on online shopping due to limited spending capacity, explaining the null effect on body esteem.

    “As for online shopping, although browsing apparel or cosmetics tends to involve exposure to appearance-highlighting content, adolescents—who may not have sufficient spending capacity—would have limited access and exposure to such content, thus explaining the null effect on body esteem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Adolescents may not have sufficient spending capacity, so they would have limited access and exposure to appearance-highlighting content on online shopping.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The body esteem scale subscales demonstrated high internal consistency: appearance α = 0.92; attribution α = 0.81; weight α = 0.94.

    “The three subscales demonstrated high internal consistency: appearance (general feelings about appearance; α = 0.92); attribution (evaluation attributed to others about one’s body and appearance; α = 0.81); and weight (weight satisfaction; α = 0.94).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The social comparison scale showed high reliability (α = 0.97).

    “Participants’ responses were averaged to index overall social comparison, either online or offline (α = 0.97).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Not only social media activities, but also appearance-related smartphone activities, are important determinants of body esteem in female adolescents.

    “Further, we identified specific smartphone activities (i.e., browsing websites, listening to music, and watching TV shows) that indirectly impact body esteem above and beyond social media screen time, suggesting that not only social media activities, but also appearance-related smartphone activities, are important determinants of body esteem in female adolescents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The weight locus of control scale showed good reliability (α = 0.81).

    “The scale showed good reliability (α = 0.81).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Female adolescents' internalization of ideal thinness enforced by social media escalates unhealthy comparison patterns, even outside of screen time, thus harming their body esteem.

    “This suggests that female adolescents’ internalization of ideal thinness enforced by social media escalates unhealthy comparison patterns, even outside of screen time, thus harming their body esteem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The use of a self-reported measure to assess daily frequency of social networking sites meant the study was unable to specify time spent on multitasking activities, and actual time spent on each smartphone activity could have been overestimated.

    “Fourth, given that we used a self-reported measure to assess daily frequency with which participants engage in social networking sites, we were unable to specify time spent on multitasking activities (e.g., accessing social media while listening to music) and thus actual time spent on each smartphone activity could have been overestimated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The sample was limited to female adolescents due to their greater susceptibility to body esteem concerns as a result of social comparisons and body-related evaluations.

    “Fifth, our sample was limited to female adolescents due to their greater susceptibility to body esteem concerns as a result of social comparisons and body-related evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study did not control for the time of year when social media and smartphone usage was assessed, raising the question whether participants' responses reflect their normal usage.

    “Lastly, given that we did not control for the time of year when social media and smartphone usage was assessed, a question arises whether participants’ response reflects their normal usage; note that it is plausible that events such as important exams or other academic stress could have suppressed or magnified participants’ media consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Smartphone use is habitual and generally time invariant and thereby does not significantly change in accordance with life events.

    “However, this is less likely since the ligature suggests that smartphone use is habitual and generally time invariant [67,68] and thereby does not significantly change in accordance with life events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [67] Elhai, 2018, Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week, Personal. Individ. Differ. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [68] Rozgonjuk, 2018, The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week, Comput. Hum. Behav. source

      Not checked in the free run.

29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A unified theoretical framework integrating cognitive and emotional factors to delineate the associations of social media and smartphone use with body-related outcomes has received relatively little attention.

    “Despite the vital implication of emotional factors, however, relatively little attention has been paid to investigating a unified theoretical framework that comprehensively integrates cognitive and emotional factors to delineate the associations of social media and smartphone use with body-related outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants' self-reported estimates of average daily smartphone and social media screen time accurately reflect their actual usage.

    “We assessed overall smartphone screen time by asking participants to estimate the average amount of time they spent on their smartphones per day.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cross-sectional serial mediation model can support causal inferences about the direction of effects from social media/smartphone use to body esteem.

    “we found that excessive social media use leads to unhealthy body esteem via intensified cognitive internalization”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The serial ordering of mediators (cognitive internalization → appearance comparison → social appearance anxiety → body esteem) is the correct causal order.

    “we investigated a cognitive-affective framework in which the associations of social media and smartphone use with body esteem are serially mediated by cognitive internalization of an ideal body image, appearance comparisons, and social appearance anxiety.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of 100 female adolescents from a local community is representative of female adolescents generally.

    “We recruited 100 female adolescents aged 13 to 18 (Mage = 15.07 years, SD = 1.33)—which is a critical age window during which female adolescents are particularly susceptible to poor body esteem [10,34], and eating-related psychopathology [38]—from a local community in exchange for a monetary reward.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social networking is one of the most frequent smartphone activities.

    “These findings suggest that since social networking is one of the most frequent smartphone activities, general smartphone screen time without social media usage does not necessarily fortify cognitive internalization of thin ideals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Browsing websites and watching TV shows often feature appearance-related content, such as thin models or celebrities who embody ideal standards of attractiveness.

    “we found that browsing websites and watching TV shows—which often feature appearance-related content, such as thin models or celebrities who embody ideal standards of attractiveness—showed significant indirect effects on body esteem via cognitive internalization, appearance comparisons, and social appearance anxiety”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Taking photos can be regarded as a creative and invigorating activity that can divert adolescents from appearance-related media content.

    “Considering that in general, taking photos can be regarded as a creative and invigorating activity that can divert adolescents from appearance-related media content, it is unlikely to influence body esteem.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adolescents may not have sufficient spending capacity, so they would have limited access and exposure to appearance-highlighting content on online shopping.

    “As for online shopping, although browsing apparel or cosmetics tends to involve exposure to appearance-highlighting content, adolescents—who may not have sufficient spending capacity—would have limited access and exposure to such content, thus explaining the null effect on body esteem.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media activities largely center on appearance-focused interactions with one’s social network.

    “Further, given that social media activities largely center on appearance-focused interactions with one’s social network (e.g., sharing and giving feedback on posted content), social media use likely influences not only one’s online networking but also real-world social exchanges.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three cross-sectional studies found that time spent on social media was associated with body image dissatisfaction via the mediating pathways of social comparison and thin ideal internalisation.

    “Three cross-sectional studies discovered that time spent on social media was associated with body image dissatisfaction via the mediating pathways of social comparison and thin ideal internalisation [51–53], indicating that the relationship between exposure and outcome is more nuanced than the mere number of hours spent online.”

    From The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

    Results §4.1 reports an indirect association between social-media screen time and poorer body esteem through thin-ideal internalization and appearance comparison in female adolescents. However, the significant association was limited to use exceeding three hours daily compared with nonuse; lower screen-time categories showed no significant indirect effect. The Discussion describes the analysis as correlational, consistent with the claim’s cross-sectional framing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Comparisons on social media tended to be 'upward' and yielded feelings of inadequacy and self-loathing.

    “Comparisons tended to be ‘upward’ and yielded feelings of inadequacy and self-loathing [53, 63, 68].”

    From The social media diet: A scoping review to investigate the association between social media, body image and eating disorders amongst young people (2023) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Discussion (section 5; page unavailable) links social media use in female adolescents to upward appearance comparison, perceived inadequacy, appearance anxiety, and poorer body esteem. It does not describe self-loathing, which is stronger than the outcomes reported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, H., Wang, J. J., Tng, G. Y. Q., & Yang, S.
Affiliations
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yang, Sujin
Venue
Children
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-21
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
148
ISSN
2227-9067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088040135
Cited by
81
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 3
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 (14-C242-SMU-031)
  • Ministry of Society and Family Fund Tier 1 (SFRF2015U-2)
  • Ewha Womans University Research Grant (1-2020-0332-001-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
social media use, smartphone use, body esteem, adolescent girls, appearance comparison, thin ideal, appearance anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, cognitive-affective model, screen time, body image

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review