Cited by 110Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingDigital Media and Philosophy

Social media use and well-being: A prospective experience-sampling study

Open access
Faelens, Lien, Hoorelbeke, Kristof, Soenens, Bart, Van Gaeveren, Kyle, De Marez, Lieven, De Raedt, Rudi, Koster, Ernst H.W.·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106510

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital multitasking particularly via smartphones and social media fragments attention and reduces sustained focus.

    “Multiple studies reported that digital multitasking particularly via smartphones and social media fragments attention and reduces sustained focus [7, 8].”

    From Cognitive benefits and risks of digital technology engagement (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports an association between passive social media use and co-occurring concentration problems. It does not examine digital multitasking or show that smartphone or social media use fragments attention or reduces sustained focus; the passage also cautions that the association does not establish direction of effect. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Media multitasking depletes working memory resources, leading to shallow processing and reduced retention.

    “Digital Technologies multitasking (e.g., switching between social media and work tasks) directly aligns with the theory’s concept of cognitive load, as divided attention depletes working memory resources, leading to shallow processing and reduced retention [7, 8].”

    From Cognitive benefits and risks of digital technology engagement (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction discusses associations between social media use, depressive symptoms, and concentration problems, but not multitasking or its effects on learning. Searches for working-memory depletion, cognitive load, shallow processing, and reduced retention found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]60. Sherlock, M., & Wagstaff, D. L. (2019). Exploring the relationship between frequency of Instagram use, exposure to idealized images, and psychological well-being in women. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 482-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000182 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faelens, L., Hoorelbeke, K., Soenens, B., Van Gaeveren, K., De Marez, L., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Faelens, Lien
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
114
Pages
106510
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046566582
Cited by
110
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
24.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Special Research Fund (BOF) of Ghent University (BOF16/DOC/323)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
social media use, Facebook, Instagram, social network sites, well-being, social comparison, self-esteem, repetitive negative thinking, negative affect, emotion regulation, young adults, temporal dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review