Cited by 22Personal Information Management and User BehaviorImpact of Technology on AdolescentsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Forecasting errors in student media multitasking during homework completion

Calderwood, Charles, Green, Jeffrey D., Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A., Moloney, Jaclyn M.·2016·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.021

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calderwood, C., Green, J. D., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Moloney, J. M.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Calderwood, Charles
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
94
Pages
37-48
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1860988741
Cited by
22
References
62
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
media multitasking, homework completion, forecast error, self-control, negative affect, homework performance, media access, student media use, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review