Cited by 10Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMind wandering and attention

As we fall asleep we forget about the future: A quantitative linguistic analysis of mentation reports from hypnagogia.

Open access
Speth, Jana, Schloerscheidt, Astrid M., Speth, Clemens·2016·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

We present a quantitative study of mental time travel to the past and future in sleep onset hypnagogia. Three independent, blind judges analysed a total of 150 mentation reports from different intervals prior to and after sleep onset. The linguistic tool for the mentation report analysis grounds on established grammatical and cognitive-semantic theories, and proof of concept has been provided in previous studies. The current results indicate that memory for the future, but not for the past, decreases in sleep onset - thereby supporting preliminary physiological evidence at the level of brain function. While recent memory research emphasizes similarities in the cognitive and physiological processes of mental time travel to the past and future, the current study explores a state of consciousness which may serve to dissociate between the two.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.014

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fosse, M. J., Fosse, R., Hobson, J. A., & Stickgold, R. J. (2003). Dreaming and Episodic Memory: A Functional Dissociation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 1-9.
  2. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 8(9), 657-61.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Speth, J., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Speth, C.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Speth, Jana
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
45
Pages
235-244
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2522423681
Cited by
10
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
hypnagogia, sleep onset, mental time travel, states of consciousness
MeSH terms
Adult, Consciousness, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Memory, Sleep Stages, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review