Cited by 73Sex and Gender in HealthcarePain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Sex differences in pain responses

Sorge, Robert E, Strath, Larissa J·2018·Current Opinion in Physiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cophys.2018.05.006

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorge, R. E., & Strath, L. J.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Sorge, Robert E
Venue
Current Opinion in Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
6
Pages
75-81
ISSN
2468-8673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807228374
Cited by
73
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Physiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
sex differences, pain perception, chronic pain, immune cells, sensory neurons, pain intensity assessment, pain coping, pain disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review