Cited by 53Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersSchizophrenia research and treatment

Cortical thickness change in autism during early childhood: CT in Early Childhood ASD

Open access
Smith, Elizabeth, Thurm, Audrey, Greenstein, Deanna, Farmer, Cristan, Swedo, Susan, Giedd, Jay, Raznahan, Armin·2016·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at high spatial resolution can detect potential foci of early brain dysmaturation in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In addition, comparison between MRI and behavior measures over time can identify patterns of brain change accompanying specific outcomes. We report structural MRI data from two time points for a total of 84 scans in children with ASD and 30 scans in typical controls (mean age time one = 4.1 years, mean age at time two = 6.6 years). Surface-based cortical morphometry and linear mixed effects models were used to link changes in cortical anatomy to both diagnostic status and individual differences in changes in language and autism severity. Compared with controls, children with ASD showed accelerated gray matter volume gain with age, which was driven by a lack of typical age-related cortical thickness (CT) decrease within 10 cortical regions involved in language, social cognition, and behavioral control. Greater expressive communication gains with age in children with ASD were associated with greater CT gains in a set of right hemisphere homologues to dominant language cortices, potentially identifying a compensatory system for closer translational study. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2616-2629, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.23195

Cites

82 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal imaging and associating neuroimaging data with longitudinal behavioural outcomes can address some limitations by characterizing differences within participants.

    “Longitudinal imaging 77 as well as associating neuroimaging data with longitudinal behavioural outcomes 78 can address some of these limitations characterizing differences within participants.”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lange N Travers BG Bigler ED Prigge MB Froehlich AL Nielsen JA Lainhart JE Longitudinal volumetric brain changes in autism spectrum disorder ages 6-35 years. Autism Res 2015 8 1 82 93 doi: 10.1002/aur.1427 25381736 PMC4344386 · DOI
  2. Raznahan A Toro R Daly E Robertson D Murphy C Deeley Q Murphy DG Cortical anatomy in autism spectrum disorder: an in vivo MRI study on the effect of age. Cerebral Cortex 2010 20 6 1332 1340 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp198 19819933 · DOI
  3. Sparrow S Cicchetti D Balla D Vineland adaptive behavior scales, survey interview form/caregiver rating form 2005 Pearson Assessments Livonia, MN 2nd ed.
  4. Wechsler D The Wechsler intelligence scale for children-fourth edition 2004 Pearson Assessment London

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E., Thurm, A., Greenstein, D., Farmer, C., Swedo, S., Giedd, J., & Raznahan, A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-07
Volume
37
Issue
7
Pages
2616-2629
ISSN
1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2341875655
Cited by
53
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZIA (MH002914)
  • Intramural Program of the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institute of Health (Protocols 06-M-0102, NCT00298246)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, cortical thickness, early childhood brain development, language development, autism severity, social cognition, behavioral control
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Linear Models, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review