Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants
Open accessAbstract
Humans adapt their behavior not only by observing the consequences of their actions but also by internally monitoring their performance. This capacity, termed metacognitive sensitivity [1, 2], has traditionally been denied to young children because they have poor capacities in verbally reporting their own mental states [3-5]. Yet, these observations might reflect children's limited capacities for explicit self-reports, rather than limitations in metacognition per se. Indeed, metacognitive sensitivity has been shown to reflect simple computational mechanisms [1, 6-8], and can be found in various non-verbal species [7-10]. Thus, it might be that this faculty is present early in development, although it would be discernible through implicit behaviors and neural indices rather than explicit self-reports. Here, by relying on such non-verbal indices, we show that 12- and 18-month-old infants internally monitor the accuracy of their own decisions. At the behavioral level, infants showed increased persistence in their initial choice after making a correct as compared to an incorrect response, evidencing an appropriate evaluation of decision confidence. Moreover, infants were able to use decision confidence adaptively to either confirm their initial choice or change their mind. At the neural level, we found that a well-established electrophysiological signature of error monitoring in adults, the error-related negativity, is similarly elicited when infants make an incorrect choice. Hence, although explicit forms of metacognition mature later during childhood, infants already estimate decision confidence, monitor their errors, and use these metacognitive evaluations to regulate subsequent behavior.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · see citing works
A neural system for error detection and compensation
Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x · Cited by 2,862 · see citing works
Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life
(1968) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.43.229.388 · Cited by 2,107 · see citing works
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,713 · see citing works
ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: A tutorial
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Christ, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0511(99)00031-9 · Cited by 1,442 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They also suggest that this component reflects mechanisms of performance monitoring that function by comparing the response that should have been made with the response that was actually performed [1, 14, 21, 22].”
BackgroundFleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, liberal versus conservative profiles), we performed a complementary non-parametric and bias-free analysis [16, 17].”
MethodLocalization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation
Dehaene, S., Posner, M. I., & Tucker, D. M. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x · Cited by 1,255 · see citing works
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P. H., & Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3850752 · Cited by 1,170 · see citing works
Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex
Kiani, R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169405 · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence
Kepecs, A., Uchida, N., Zariwala, H. A., & Mainen, Z. F. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07200 · Cited by 809 · see citing works
The neural basis of metacognitive ability
Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0417 · Cited by 747 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, the neural computations underlying this second metacognitive process are well documented in adults [1, 18].”
BackgroundTwo-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring
Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0416 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Scheffers, M. K., & Coles, M. G. H. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.141 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Schneider, W. (2008) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2008.00041.x · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Galvin, S. J., Podd, J. V., Drga, V., & Whitmore, J. (2003) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196546 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., Bellgrove, M. A., Kelly, S. P., Hester, R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., & Foxe, J. J. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05477.x · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition
Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.006 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
(2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.001.0001 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection
Boldt, A., & Yeung, N. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0797-14.2015 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
A neural marker of perceptual consciousness in infants
Kouider, S., Stahlhut, C., Gelskov, S. V., Barbosa, L. S., Dutat, M., de Gardelle, V., Christophe, A., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232509 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationMyelination of language-related areas in the developing brain
Pujol, J., Soriano‐Mas, C., Ortiz, H., Sebastián‐Gallés, N., Losilla, J.-M., & Deus, J. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000201049.66073.8d · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Infants ask for help when they know they don’t know
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515129113 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms?
Hampton, R. R. (2009) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2009.40002 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Required for Optimal Waiting Based on Decision Confidence
Lak, A., Costa, G. M., Romberg, E., Koulakov, A. A., Mainen, Z. F., & Kepecs, A. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.039 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection
Charles, L., Van Opstal, F., Marti, S., & Dehaene, S. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.054 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Infant brains detect arithmetic errors
Berger, A., Tzur, G., & Posner, M. I. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605350103 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Three‐year‐old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task
Balcomb, F. K., & Gerken, L. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00725.x · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Cognitive Illusions of Authorship Reveal Hierarchical Error Detection in Skilled Typists
Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1190483 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Dissociable correlates of response conflict and error awareness in error-related brain activity
Hughes, G., & Yeung, N. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.036 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition
Fleming, S., & Frith, C. (2014) · Springer Berlin Heidelberg · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Young Children Bet on Their Numerical Skills
Vo, V. A., Li, R., Kornell, N., Pouget, A., & Cantlon, J. F. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614538458 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Feeling Uncertain and Acting on It During the Preschool Years: A Metacognitive Approach
Ghetti, S., Hembacher, E., & Coughlin, C. A. (2013) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12035 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research
Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J., & Beran, M. J. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0366 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Metacognition and mindreading: one or two functions?
Proust, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.003.0015 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Metacognition in infants and young children
Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., Kristen, S., & Perst, H. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646739.003.0008 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Psychophysical thresholds of face visibility during infancy
Gelskov, S. V., & Kouider, S. (2009) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.012 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is consciousness, and could machines have it?
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8871 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Self-citationBeing a Beast Machine: The Somatic Basis of Selfhood
Seth, A. K., & Tsakiris, M. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.008 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis
Fleming, S. M. (2024) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
“These so-called “implicit” measures of metacognition have recently found their way into innovative studies of infant metacognition, where explicit confidence elicitation is less straightforward (Goupil & Kouider, 2016).”
Behavior- and Modality-General Representation of Confidence in Orbitofrontal Cortex
Masset, P., Ott, T., Lak, A., Hirokawa, J., & Kepecs, A. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.022 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Identifying cultural differences in metacognition.
van der Plas, E., Zhang, S., Dong, K., Bang, D., Li, J., Wright, N. D., & Fleming, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0001209 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Pasquinelli, E., Farina, M., Bedel, A., & Casati, R. (2021) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12286 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Resendes, T., Benchimol-Elkaim, B., Delisle, C., René, J.-L., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2021) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101117 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goupil, L., & Kouider, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- New York University Abu Dhabi (AE)
- Corresponding author
- Goupil, Louise
- Kouider, Sid
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3038-3045
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5130696
- OpenAlex
- W2533459361
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- metacognitive sensitivity, preverbal infants, decision confidence, error monitoring, error-related negativity, metacognitive development
- MeSH terms
- Metacognition, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Humans, Infant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
