Cited by 197Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Modulation of risk-taking in marijuana users by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)

Boggio, Paulo S., Zaghi, Soroush, Villani, Ana Beatriz, Fecteau, Shirley, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Fregni, Felipe·2010·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Cognitive deficits that are reported in heavy marijuana users (attention, memory, affect perception, decision-making) appear to be completely reversible after a prolonged abstinence period of about 28 days. However, it remains unclear whether the reversibility of these cognitive deficits indicates that (1) chronic marijuana use is not associated with long-lasting changes in cortical networks or (2) that such changes occur but the brain adapts to and compensates for the drug-induced changes. Therefore, we examined whether chronic marijuana smokers would demonstrate a differential pattern of response in comparison to healthy volunteers on a decision-making paradigm (Risk Task) while undergoing sham or active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Twenty-five chronic marijuana users who were abstinent for at least 24h were randomly assigned to receive left anodal/right cathodal tDCS of DLPFC (n=8), right anodal/left cathodal tDCS of DLPFC (n=9), or sham stimulation (n=8); results on Risk Task during sham/active tDCS were compared to healthy volunteers from a previously published dataset. Chronic marijuana users demonstrated more conservative (i.e. less risky) decision-making during sham stimulation. While right anodal stimulation of the DLPFC enhanced conservative decision-making in healthy volunteers, both right anodal and left anodal DLPFC stimulation increased the propensity for risk-taking in marijuana users. These findings reveal alterations in the decision-making neural networks among chronic marijuana users. Finally, we also assessed the effects of tDCS on marijuana craving and observed that right anodal/left cathodal tDCS of DLPFC is significantly associated with a diminished craving for marijuana.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.019

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boggio, P. S., Zaghi, S., Villani, A. B., Fecteau, S., Pascual-Leone, A., & Fregni, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (BR)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Boggio, Paulo S.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
220-225
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136694183
Cited by
197
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
chronic marijuana use, risk-taking, decision-making, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, transcranial direct current stimulation, cognitive impairment, abstinence, anodal stimulation
MeSH terms
Attention, Cannabis, Decision Making, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk, Risk-Taking, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review