Cited by 178Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurological disorders and treatments

A randomized controlled trial of targeted prefrontal cortex modulation with tDCS in patients with alcohol dependence

Open access
Klauss, Jaisa, Penido Pinheiro, Leon Cleres, Silva Merlo, Bruna Lima, Correia Santos, Gerson de Almeida, Fregni, Felipe, Nitsche, Michael A., Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios, Ester·2014·The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Preliminary small studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces craving in alcoholic subjects. It is unclear whether tDCS also leads to changes in clinically meaningful outcomes for alcohol dependence in a properly powered phase II randomized clinical trial. We aimed to investigate whether repetitive tDCS changes the risk of alcohol use relapse in severe alcoholics from outpatient services. Thirty-five subjects were randomized to receive active bilateral [left cathodal/right anodal over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC)] repetitive (five consecutive days) tDCS (2 mA, 35 cm2, two times daily stimulation for 13 min with a 20-min interval) or sham-tDCS. There were two dropouts before treatment. From 33 alcoholic subjects, 17 (mean age 45.5±8.9 s.d., 16 males) were randomized to sham and 16 (44±7.8 s.d., 16 males) to real tDCS treatment. By the end of the six months of follow-up, two subjects treated with sham (11.8%) and eight treated with real tDCS (50%) were still alcohol-abstinent [p=0.02, Long-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test, HR=0.35 (95% CI, 0.14-0.85)]. No differences with regard to changes on scores of craving, frontal function, global mental status, depressive or anxiety symptoms were observed between groups. However, subjects from the tDCS group improved with regard to their overall perception of quality of life (p=0.02), and increased their scores in the environment domain (p=0.04) after treatment. Bilateral tDCS over dlPFC reduces relapse probability in severe alcoholic subjects and results in improved perception of quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145714000984

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Proescholdt MG, Walter M, Wiesbeck GA (2012) [Alcohol and violence: a current review]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 80:441-449.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klauss, J., Penido Pinheiro, L. C., Silva Merlo, B. L., Correia Santos, G. D. A., Fregni, F., Nitsche, M. A., & Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Venue
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2014-07-10
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
1793-1803
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2153481993
Cited by
178
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, alcoholism, alcohol relapse, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, craving, alcohol abstinence, quality of life, non-pharmacological treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review