Cited by 3,612Digital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing SystemsApplied Advanced Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification

Open access

Abstract

The Digital Twin (DT) is commonly known as a key enabler for the digital transformation, however, in literature is no common understanding concerning this term. It is used slightly different over the disparate disciplines. The aim of this paper is to provide a categorical literature review of the DT in manufacturing and to classify existing publication according to their level of integration of the DT. Therefore, it is distinct between Digital Model (DM), Digital Shadow (DS) and Digital Twin. The results are showing, that literature concerning the highest development stage, the DT, is scarce, whilst there is more literature about DM and DS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

6 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lee, Jay; Lapira, Edzel; Bagheri, Behrad; Kao, Hung-an (2013b). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Negri, 2017, A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems, Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939, 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.198 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Reeves, 2017, Spotlight on the Digital Twin, In ANSYS Advantage, 2017
  4. Zhang, Hao; Liu, Qiang; Chen, Xin; Zhang, Ding; Leng, Jiewu (2017). A digital twin-based approach for designing and decoupling of hollow glass production line. In IEEE Access, p. 1. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Austria (AT)
Corresponding author
Kritzinger, Werner
Venue
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1016-1022
ISSN
2405-8963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890904471
Cited by
3,612
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 761 · 2025: 639 · 2024: 576 · 2023: 577 · 2022: 437 · 2021: 356 · 2020: 194 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 1
FWCI
128.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IFAC-PapersOnLine (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
Keywords
digital twin, manufacturing industry, digital models, digital shadow, digital transformation, terminology, levels of integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review