Cited by 145Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Effectiveness of Internet‐based cognitive behaviour therapy for panic disorder in routine psychiatric care

Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Bergström, J., Andersson, G., Kaldo, V., Jansson, L., Andersson, E. +8 more·2013·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

Objective: Guided Internet‐based cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) for panic disorder has been shown to be efficacious in several randomized controlled trials. However, the effectiveness of the treatment when delivered within routine psychiatric care has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of ICBT for panic disorder within the context of routine psychiatric care. Method: We conducted a cohort study investigating all patients (n = 570) who had received guided ICBT for panic disorder between 2007 and 2012 in a routine care setting at an out‐patient psychiatric clinic providing Internet‐based treatment. The primary outcome measure was the Panic Disorder Severity Scale‐Self‐report (PDSS‐SR). Results: Participants made large improvements from screening and pretreatment assessments to posttreatment (Cohen's d range on the PDSS‐SR = 1.07–1.55). Improvements were sustained at 6‐month follow‐up. Conclusion: This study suggests that ICBT for panic disorder is as effective when delivered in a routine care context as in the previously published randomized controlled trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12079

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Rück, C., Bergström, J., Andersson, G., Kaldo, V., Jansson, L., Andersson, E., Andersson, E., Blom, K., El Alaoui, S., Falk, L., Ivarsson, J., Nasri, B., Rydh, S., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Neuroscience Division of Psychiatry Karolinska Institutet Stockholm
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
457-467
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2067472354
Cited by
144
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23
FWCI
33.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, panic disorder, psychiatric outpatient clinic, treatment effectiveness, sustained treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Department, Hospital, Psychiatry, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review