Cited by 575Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 38 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Duration of preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease in relation to age, sex, and APOE genotype

Open access
Vermunt, Lisa, Sikkes, Sietske A.M., van den Hout, Ardo, Handels, Ron, Bos, Isabelle, van der Flier, Wiesje M., Kern, Silke, Ousset, Pierre‐Jean, Maruff, Paul, Skoog, Ingmar, Verhey, Frans R.J., Freund‐Levi, Yvonne, Tsolaki, Magda, Wallin, Åsa K., Olde Rikkert, Marcel, Soininen, Hilkka, Spiru, Luisa, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Scheltens, Philip, Muniz‐Terrera, Graciela, Visser, Pieter Jelle, for the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, AIBL Research Group, ICTUS/DSA study groups·2019·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: We estimated the age‐specific duration of the preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the influence of sex, setting, apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype, and cerebrospinal fluid tau on disease duration. Methods: We performed multistate modeling in a combined sample of 6 cohorts (n = 3268) with death as the end stage and estimated the preclinical, prodromal, and dementia stage duration. Results: The overall AD duration varied between 24 years (age 60) and 15 years (age 80). For individuals presenting with preclinical AD, age 70, the estimated preclinical AD duration was 10 years, prodromal AD 4 years, and dementia 6 years. Male sex, clinical setting, APOE ε4 allele carriership, and abnormal cerebrospinal fluid tau were associated with a shorter duration, and these effects depended on disease stage. Discussion: Estimates of AD disease duration become more accurate if age, sex, setting, APOE, and cerebrospinal fluid tau are taken into account. This will be relevant for clinical practice and trial design.

Checked 2026-10-06 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.001

Cites

47 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

20 Own result · 18 Not checked yet · 10 Own method · 7 Own interpretation

Verify all 38 references — free account

Show all 17 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
38 of 38
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unclear how long individuals with amyloid pathology spend in each Alzheimer's disease stage.

    “but it is unclear how long individuals with amyloid pathology spend in each stage.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Progression risk is independent of the time already spent in a stage.

    “underlying assumption that progression risk is independent on the previous time spend in a stage”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A better understanding of the stage-specific duration of Alzheimer's disease is needed to inform patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

    “A better understanding of the stage-specific duration of AD is needed to inform patients, caregivers, and clinicians.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. TFagan GStrobelhttps://www.alzforum.org/news/conference‐coverage/ban2401‐removes‐brain‐amyloid‐possibly‐slows‐cognitive‐declineAccessed February 20 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vermunt, L., Sikkes, S. A. M., van den Hout, A., Handels, R., Bos, I., van der Flier, W. M., Kern, S., Ousset, P., Maruff, P., Skoog, I., Verhey, F. R. J., Freund‐Levi, Y., Tsolaki, M., Wallin, Å. K., Olde Rikkert, M., Soininen, H., Spiru, L., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Scheltens, P., Muniz‐Terrera, G., Visser, P. J., Initiative, F. T. A. D. N., AIBL Research Group, & groups, I. S.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Department of Statistical Science University College London London UK
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Department of Neurology Alzheimer Center Amsterdam Amsterdam Neuroscience Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Department of Geriatric Medicine Radboudumc Alzheimer Centre Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Centre for Dementia Prevention University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Corresponding author
Vermunt, Lisa
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
888-898
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2947634966
Cited by
570
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 2
FWCI
39.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Interreg (SFC, 2016-202)
  • National Institutes of Health (P01AG043362, U01 AG024904)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-12-2-0012)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2015-02830, 2013-8717)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2013-2496, 2013-2300, 2010-0870, 2012-1138)
  • Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset (ALF 716681)
  • Alzheimer's Association (ZEN-01-3151, IIRG-00-2159)
  • European Commission (QLK6-CT-2002-02645)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease duration
MeSH terms
Aged, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Female, Genotype, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Biomarkers, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Positron-Emission Tomography, Apolipoprotein E4, Cognitive Dysfunction, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review