Cited by 596International Business and FDIManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge Management

International business responses to institutional voids

Open access
Doh, Jonathan, Rodrigues, Suzana, Saka-Helmhout, Ayse, Makhija, Mona·2017·Journal of International Business Studies

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/s41267-017-0074-z

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The voids-and-development literature identifies three institution-forming strategies adopted by businesses: inducing other stakeholders to create or improve market institutions, collaborating with other stakeholders to create or improve market institutions, and internalising market institution functions.

    “The voids-and-development literature (e.g.Khanna & Palepu, 2010;Doh et al., 2017;Turker & Vural, 2017) identifies three different institution-forming strategies adopted by businesses: inducing other stakeholders to create or improve market institutions, collaborating with other stakeholders to create or improve market institutions, and internalising market institution functions.”

    From Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets (2021) · cites this paper as Doh et al., 2017

    The Introduction and “Firm Strategies for Addressing Institutional Voids” (page numbers unavailable) describe firms influencing governments, partnering to create standards, and internalizing functions otherwise performed by intermediaries. They do not identify these as the claimed three-part taxonomy of institution-forming strategies; the paper’s stated three options are internalizing, shaping conditions, and avoiding the environment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Filling institutional voids has been widely identified as a strategy for businesses.

    “Filling those voids has been widely identified as a strategy for businesses”
  • The traditional meter taxi market in Colombia and South Africa evidences features typical of institutionally void markets described in the voids-and-development literature.

    “The traditional meter taxi market in the two countries we studied evidences features typical of those described by the voids-anddevelopment literature (e.g.Mair et al., 2012;Elert & Henrekson, 2016;Doh et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boddewyn, J., & Doh, J. P. 2011. Global strategy and the collaboration of MNEs, governments and NGOs for the provisioning of collective goods in emerging markets. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 345-361.
  2. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2003. Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 453-517.
  3. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2010. (with Richard Bullock).Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  4. Siegel, J. 2004. Do foreign firms choose not to cross-list because they have secured better alternatives? Commitment mecha- nism than cross-listings for emerging economy firms? Evi- dence from Mexico. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 1171-1191.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doh, J., Rodrigues, S., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Makhija, M.
Affiliations
  • Villanova University (US)
  • Universidade Fundação Mineira de Educação e Cultura (BR)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Makhija, Mona
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2017-04
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
293-307
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W2604697132
Cited by
596
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
70.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • ERIM Top-Core Articles
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
institutional voids, business strategy, corporate structure, transaction costs, internalization, substitution, borrowing, signaling, economic institutions, social institutions, firm behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review