Cited by 41Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

Testing enhances learning across a range of episodic memory abilities

Pan, Steven C., Pashler, Harold, Potter, Zachary E., Rickard, Timothy C.·2015·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2015.04.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, S. C., Pashler, H., Potter, Z. E., & Rickard, T. C.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Rickard, Timothy C.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
83
Pages
53-61
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120638953
Cited by
41
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
testing effect, episodic memory, individual differences, memory ability, replication, sampling bias, ability distribution, memory training, educational implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review