Cited by 343Birth, Development, and HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumStress Responses and Cortisol

Is there a viability–vulnerability tradeoff? Sex differences in fetal programming

Open access
Sandman, Curt A, Glynn, Laura M, Davis, Elysia Poggi·2013·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective In this paper we evaluate the evidence for sex differences in fetal programming within the context of the proposed viability-vulnerability tradeoff.Methods We briefly review the literature on the factors contributing to primary and secondary sex ratios. Sex differences in fetal programming are assessed by summarizing previously published sex difference findings from our group (6 studies) and also new analyses of previously published findings in which sex differences were not reported (6 studies).Results The review and reanalysis of studies from our group are consistent with the overwhelming evidence of increasing risk for viability among males exposed to environmental adversity early in life. New evidence reported here support the argument that females, despite their adaptive agility, also are influenced by exposure to early adversity. Two primary conclusions are (i) female fetal exposure to psychobiological stress selectively influences fear/anxiety, and (ii) the effects of female fetal exposure to stress persist into preadolescence. These persisting effects are reflected in increased levels of anxiety, impaired executive function and neurological markers associated with these behaviors.Conclusions A tacit assumption is that females, with their adaptive flexibility early in gestation, escape the consequences of early life exposure to adversity. We argue that the consequences of male exposure to early adversity threaten their viability, effectively culling the weak and the frail and creating a surviving cohort of the fittest. Females adjust to early adversity with a variety of strategies, but their escape from the risk of early mortality and morbidity has a price of increased vulnerability expressed later in development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.009

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infant biological sex will be used in analyses of infant outcomes as male sex is associated with less optimal outcomes, maternal prenatal depression and impaired neonatal motor behavior, and female sex is associated with prenatal maternal depression and increased anxiety.

    “Infant biological sex will be used in analyses of infant outcomes as male sex is associated with less optimal outcomes [40], maternal prenatal depression and impaired neonatal motor behavior [41], and female sex is associated with prenatal maternal depression and increased anxiety.”

    From The mastery lifestyle intervention to reduce biopsychosocial risks for pregnant Latinas and African Americans and their infants: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Females, but not males, exposed to elevated levels of maternal cortisol early in pregnancy had significantly enlarged amygdala and increased levels of anxiety in childhood.

    “Additionally, females, but not males, exposed to elevated levels of maternal cortisol early in pregnancy had significantly enlarged amygdala and increased levels of anxiety in childhood [123].”

    From Stress and the HPA Axis: Balancing Homeostasis and Fertility. (2017) · cites this paper as [123]

  • Effects of female fetal exposure to stress persists into preadolescence, as reflected in increased levels of anxiety, impaired executive function, and neurological markers associated with these behaviors.

    “The effects of female fetal exposure to stress persists into preadolescence, as reflected in increased levels of anxiety, impaired executive function, and neurological markers associated with these behaviors [123].”

    From Stress and the HPA Axis: Balancing Homeostasis and Fertility. (2017) · cites this paper as [123]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Smith JM Game theory and the evolution of fighting On Evolution Edinburgh University Press 1972

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandman, C. A., Glynn, L. M., & Davis, E. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Chapman University (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Sandman, Curt A
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
327-335
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140404034
Cited by
343
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH096889, MH096889)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-41298;, R01NS041298)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000827)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD028413, HD 51852, R01HD051852, HD-28413, R01HD040967, HD-50662, R01HD065823, HD40967, R01HD050662, HD065823)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
fetal programming, sex differences, childhood adversity, prenatal stress, sex ratio, anxiety, executive function, brain development
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Brain, Child, Child Development, Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Fear, Female, Fetal Viability, Gestational Age, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Milk, Human, Organ Size, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Placenta, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Biomarkers, Pregnant People, Fetal Development, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review