Cited by 187Birth, Development, and HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumStress Responses and Cortisol

Maternal care modulates the relationship between prenatal risk and hippocampal volume in women but not in men

Open access
Buss, Claudia, Lord, Catherine, Wadiwalla, Mehereen, Hellhammer, Dirk H., Lupien, Sonia J., Meaney, Michael J., Pruessner, Jens C.·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Smaller hippocampal volume is associated with psychiatric disorders. Variations in hippocampal volume are discussed as both a consequence of the neurotoxic effects of stress and as a pre-existing condition leading to increased vulnerability for cognitive and emotional impairments. To investigate whether early experience can account for variability in hippocampal volume in adulthood (vulnerability hypothesis), we assessed the relationship between birth weight and hippocampal volume in 44 subjects. The reported quality of maternal care in early childhood, as evaluated by the Parental Bonding Inventory, was used as index of the quality of the postnatal environment. Hippocampal volume was assessed from magnetic resonance images using a manual segmentation protocol. We show that birth weight significantly predicts hippocampal volume in adulthood only in female subjects reporting low maternal care. The results suggest that the postnatal environment modulates the neurodevelopmental consequences of prenatal risk and that this effect is sex-specific.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3252-06.2007

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buss, C., Lord, C., Wadiwalla, M., Hellhammer, D. H., Lupien, S. J., Meaney, M. J., & Pruessner, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-03-07
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
2592-2595
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2050889951
Cited by
187
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
FWCI
14.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (67071)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (249996)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
maternal care, hippocampal volume, birth weight, prenatal risk, sex differences, postnatal environment, brain development, vulnerability hypothesis, childhood stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Child, Child Rearing, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mothers, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Physiological, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review