CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 510

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plastic contamination of the food chain: A threat to human health?

Waring, R.H., Harris, R.M., Mitchell, S.C.·2018·Maturitas
DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Macro-plastic pollution is found in terrestrial and marine environments and is degraded to micro-particles (MP) and nano-particles (NP) of plastic. These can enter the human food chain either by inhalation or by ingestion, particularly of shellfish and crustaceans. Absorption across the gastrointestinal tract is relatively low, especially for MPs, which appear to have little toxicity. However, NPs are more readily absorbed and may accumulate in the brain, liver and other tissues in aquatic species and other animals. Studies using nanoparticles of other materials suggest that toxicity could potentially affect the central nervous system and the reproductive system, although this would be unlikely unless exposure levels were very high and absorption was increased by physiological factors.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.010

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Bouwmeeste, 2015, Potential health impact of environmentally released micro- and nanoplastics in the human food production chain: experiences from nanotoxicology, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 8932, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01090 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Masser, 2017, Cadmium, lead and bromine in beached microplastics, EnvironmentalPollution, 227, 139
  3. Scott, 1999, Polymers and the environment, Royal Soc. Chem. Lond., 1
  4. Alimi, 2018, Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments: aggregation, deposition and enhanced contaminant transport, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 1704, 10.1021/acs.est.7b05559 · DOI · Paper page
  5. De Falco, 2018, Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics, Environ. Pollut., 236, 916, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.057 · DOI
  6. Munari, 2017, Microplastics in the sediments of Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica), Mar. Pollut. Bull., 122, 161, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.039 · DOI
  7. Ling, 2017, Ubiquity of microplastics in coastal sea floor sediments, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 121, 104, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.05.038 · DOI
  8. Hermsen, 2017, Detection of low numbers of microplastics in North Sea fish using strict quality assurance criteria, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 122, 253, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.051 · DOI
  9. Liboiron, 2016, Low plastic ingestion rate in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from Newfound land destined for human consumption collected through citizen science methods, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 113, 428, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.043 · DOI
  10. Pazos, 2017, Microplastics in gut contents of coastal freshwater fish from Rio de la Plata estuary, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 12, 85, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.007 · DOI
  11. McGoran, 2017, Presence of microplastic in the digestive tracts of European flounder, Platichthys flesus, and European smelt, Osmerus eperlanus, from the River Thames, Environ. Pollut., 220, 744, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.078 · DOI
  12. Ward, 2009, Marine aggregates facilitate ingestion of nanoparticles by suspension-feeding bivalves, Mar. Environ. Res., 68, 137, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.05.002 · DOI
  13. Wegner, 2012, Effects of nanopolystyrene on the feeding behaviour of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.), Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 31, 2490, 10.1002/etc.1984 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bhattacharya, 2010, Physical adsorption of charged plastic nanoparticles affects algal photosynthesis, J. Phys. Chem., 114, 16556
  15. Cedervall, 2012, Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish, PLoS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0032254 · DOI
  16. Van Cauwenberghe, 2014, Microplastics in bivalves cultured for human consumption, Environ. Pollut., 193, 65, 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.010 · DOI
  17. Vandermeersch, 2015, Environmental contaminants of emerging concern in seafood -European database on contaminant levels, Environ. Res., 143, 29, 10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.011 · DOI
  18. Andrady, 2017, The plastics in microplastics: a review, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 119, 12, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.082 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Keswani, 2016, Microbial hitchhikers on marine plastic debris: human exposure risks at bathing waters and beach environments, Mar. Environ. Res., 118, 10, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.04.006 · DOI
  20. Dris, 2015, Microplastic contamination in an urban area: a case study in Greater Paris, Environ. Chem., 12, 592, 10.1071/EN14167 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Prata, 2018, Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health?, Environ. Pollut., 234, 115, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.043 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dris, 2017, A first overview of textile fibres including microplastics in indoor and outdoor environments, Environ. Pollut., 221, 453, 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.013 · DOI
  23. Liebezeit, 2014, Synthetic particles as contaminants in German beers, Food Addit. Contam. Part. A, Chem. Anal. Control Exposure Risk Assess., 31, 1574, 10.1080/19440049.2014.945099 · DOI
  24. R. Visagan, R. Grossman, P.A. Dimitriadis, A. Desai, ‘Crohn’z meanz Heinz’: Foreign body inflammatory mass mimicking Crohn’s disease, BMJ Case Rep (2013) 6th June Doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009603. · DOI
  25. Guirgis, 2011, Accidental ingestion of plastic from takeaway containers- food for thought, Med. J. Aust., 194, 245, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb02955.x · DOI
  26. Newell, 2000, Plastic bread-bag clips in the gastrointestinal tract: report of 5 cases and review of the literature, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 162, 527
  27. Oppenheimer, 1955, Further studies on polymers as carcinogenic agents in animals, Cancer Res., 15, 333
  28. Sherman, 1969, The biological fate of implanted rigid polyurethane foams, J Surg. Res., 9, 167, 10.1016/0022-4804(69)90048-1 · DOI
  29. Wilkes, 2017, Degradation and metabolism of synthetic plastics and associated products by Pseudomonoas sp.: capabilities and challenges, J. Appl. Microbiol., 123, 582, 10.1111/jam.13472 · DOI
  30. Auta, 2017, Screening of Bacillus strains isolated from mangrove ecosystems in Peninsula Malaysia for microplastic degradation, Environ. Pollut., 231, 1552, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.043 · DOI
  31. Yang, 2015, Biodegradation and mineralisation of polystyrene by plastic-eating mealworms: part 2. Role of gut microorganisms, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 12087, 10.1021/acs.est.5b02663 · DOI
  32. Bergami, 2016, Nano-sized polystyrene affects feeding behaviour and physiology of brine shrimp Artemia franciscana larvae, Ecotox Environ. Saf., 123, 18, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.09.021 · DOI
  33. Ribeira, 2017, Microplastics effects on Scrobicularia plano, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 122, 379, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.078 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Gray, 2017, Size- and shape-dependent effects of microplastic particles on adult daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio), Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 36, 3074, 10.1002/etc.3881 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Schirinzi, 2017, Cytotoxic effects of commonly used nanomaterials and microplastics on cerebral and epithelial human cells, Environ. Res., 159, 579, 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.043 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Revel, 2018, Micro(nano)plastics: a threat to human health?, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health, 1, 17, 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.003 · DOI
  37. Mahler, 2012, Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoparticles affects iron absorption, Nat. Nanotechnol., 7, 264, 10.1038/nnano.2012.3 · DOI
  38. Kulkarnhi, 2013, Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery, Pharm. Res., 10, 2512, 10.1007/s11095-012-0958-3 · DOI
  39. Nance, 2017, Brain-penetrating nanoparticles for analysis of the brain microenvironment, Methods Mol. Biol., 1570, 91, 10.1007/978-1-4939-6840-4_6 · DOI
  40. Chae, 2017, Effects of micro- and nanoplastics in aquatic ecosystems: current research trends and perspectives, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 124, 624, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.070 · DOI
  41. Zhang, 2018, Gestational exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles impairs the placentation through dysregulation of vascularization, proliferation and apoptosis in mice, Int. J. Nanomed., 13, 777, 10.2147/IJN.S152400 · DOI
  42. Zhang, 2017, Current understanding of the toxicological risk posed to the fetus following maternal exposure to nanoparticles, Exp. Opin. Drug. Metab. Toxicol., 13, 1251, 10.1080/17425255.2018.1397131 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waring, R. H., Harris, R. M., & Mitchell, S. C.
Venue
Maturitas
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
115
Pages
64-68
ISSN
0378-5122
DOI
10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.010
Cited by
510
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review