Cited by 1,065

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Role for NBR1 in Autophagosomal Degradation of Ubiquitinated Substrates

Kirkin, Vladimir, Lamark, Trond, Sou, Yu-Shin, Bjørkøy, Geir, Nunn, Jennifer L., Bruun, Jack-Ansgar, Shvets, Elena, McEwan, David G., Clausen, Terje H., Wild, Philipp, Bilusic, Ivana, Theurillat, Jean-Philippe, Øvervatn, Aud, Ishii, Tetsuro, Elazar, Zvulun, Komatsu, Masaaki, Dikic, Ivan, Johansen, Terje·2009·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Autophagy is a catabolic process where cytosolic cellular components are delivered to the lysosome for degradation. Recent studies have indicated the existence of specific receptors, such as p62, which link ubiquitinated targets to autophagosomal degradation pathways. Here we show that NBR1 (neighbor of BRCA1 gene 1) is an autophagy receptor containing LC3- and ubiquitin (Ub)-binding domains. NBR1 is recruited to Ub-positive protein aggregates and degraded by autophagy depending on an LC3-interacting region (LIR) and LC3 family modifiers. Although NBR1 and p62 interact and form oligomers, they can function independently, as shown by autophagosomal clearance of NBR1 in p62-deficient cells. NBR1 was localized to Ub-positive inclusions in patients with liver dysfunction, and depletion of NBR1 abolished the formation of Ub-positive p62 bodies upon puromycin treatment of cells. We propose that NBR1 and p62 act as receptors for selective autophagosomal degradation of ubiquitinated targets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.020

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GFP-LC3 is more stable than GFP-SQSTM1 or GFP-NBR1.

    “Although GFP-LC3 can be used as a reporter for flow cytometry, it is more stable (which is not necessarily ideal for flux measurements) than GFP-SQSTM1 or GFP-NBR1 (NBR1 is an autophagy receptor with structural similarity to SQSTM1 [496]).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bjørkøy, 2005, p62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death, J. Cell Biol., 171, 603, 10.1083/jcb.200507002 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ikeda, 2008, Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals, EMBO Rep., 9, 536, 10.1038/embor.2008.93 · DOI
  3. Kirkin, 2007, Role of ubiquitin- and Ubl-binding proteins in cell signaling, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 19, 199, 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.002 · DOI
  4. Komatsu, 2006, Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice, Nature, 441, 880, 10.1038/nature04723 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Komatsu, 2007, Homeostatic levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy-deficient mice, Cell, 131, 1149, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.035 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lamark, 2003, Interaction codes within the family of mammalian Phox and Bem1p domain-containing proteins, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 34568, 10.1074/jbc.M303221200 · DOI
  7. Lange, 2005, The kinase domain of titin controls muscle gene expression and protein turnover, Science, 308, 1599, 10.1126/science.1110463 · DOI
  8. Mizushima, 2001, Dissection of autophagosome formation using Apg5-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, J. Cell Biol., 152, 657, 10.1083/jcb.152.4.657 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Mizushima, 2004, In vivo analysis of autophagy in response to nutrient starvation using transgenic mice expressing a fluorescent autophagosome marker, Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 1101, 10.1091/mbc.E03-09-0704 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Noda, 2008, Structural basis of target recognition by Atg8/LC3 during selective autophagy, Genes Cells, 13, 1211, 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01238.x · DOI
  11. Pierre, 2005, Dendritic cells, DRiPs, and DALIS in the control of antigen processing, Immunol. Rev., 207, 184, 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00300.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Raasi, 2005, Diverse polyubiquitin interaction properties of ubiquitin-associated domains, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 12, 708, 10.1038/nsmb962 · DOI
  13. Ramesh Babu, 2008, Genetic inactivation of p62 leads to accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau and neurodegeneration, J. Neurochem., 106, 107, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05340.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Shintani, 2002, Mechanism of cargo selection in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway, Dev. Cell, 3, 825, 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00373-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shvets, 2008, Both the N-terminus and phenylalanine 52 of LC3 take part in p62/SQSTM1 recruitment into autophagosomes, J. Cell Sci., 121, 2685, 10.1242/jcs.026005 · DOI
  16. Stefani, 2003, Protein aggregation and aggregate toxicity: new insights into protein folding, misfolding diseases and biological evolution, J. Mol. Med., 81, 678, 10.1007/s00109-003-0464-5 · DOI
  17. Wooten, 2008, Essential role of sequestosome 1/p62 in regulating accumulation of Lys63-ubiquitinated proteins, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 6783, 10.1074/jbc.M709496200 · DOI
  18. Xie, 2007, Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 1102, 10.1038/ncb1007-1102 · DOI
  19. Xin, 2001, Cloning, expression patterns, and chromosome localization of three human and two mouse homologues of GABA(A) receptor-associated protein, Genomics, 74, 408, 10.1006/geno.2001.6555 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kirkin, V., Lamark, T., Sou, Y.-S., Bjørkøy, G., Nunn, J. L., Bruun, J.-A., Shvets, E., McEwan, D. G., Clausen, T. H., Wild, P., Bilusic, I., Theurillat, J.-P., Øvervatn, A., Ishii, T., Elazar, Z., Komatsu, M., Dikic, I., & Johansen, T.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
505-516
ISSN
1097-2765
Cited by
1,065
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review