Cited by 272Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills

Open access
Johansen-Berg, Heidi, Della-Maggiore, Valeria, Behrens, Timothy E.J., Smith, Stephen M., Paus, Tomáš·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Variation in brain structure may reflect variation in functional properties of specific brain systems. Structural variation may therefore reflect variation in behavioural performance. Here, we use diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to show that variation in white matter integrity in a specific region in the body of the corpus callosum is associated with variation in performance of a bimanual co-ordination task. When the callosal region showing this association is used as a seed for probabilistic tractography, inter-hemispheric pathways are generated to the supplementary motor area and caudal cingulate motor area. This provides further evidence for the role of medial wall motor areas in bimanual co-ordination and supports the idea that variation in brain structure reflects inter-individual differences in skilled performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.041

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Behrens T Johansen-Berg H Rushworth MFS Woolrich M Multi-fibre modelling of diffusion data: What can it add NeuroImage in press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansen-Berg, H., Della-Maggiore, V., Behrens, T. E. J., Smith, S. M., & Paus, T.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
36
Pages
T16-T21
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029334347
Cited by
272
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078204)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
corpus callosum, white matter integrity, bimanual coordination, individual differences, supplementary motor area, probabilistic tractography, diffusion-weighted imaging, motor performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Corpus Callosum, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review