Cited by 70Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Examining the relationships between cortical maturation and white matter myelination throughout early childhood

Open access
Croteau-Chonka, Elise C., Dean, Douglas C., Remer, Justin, Dirks, Holly, O'Muircheartaigh, Jonathan, Deoni, Sean C.L.·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

Cortical development and white matter myelination are hallmark processes of infant and child neurodevelopment, and play a central role in the evolution of cognitive and behavioral functioning. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to independently track these microstructural and morphological changes in vivo, however few studies have investigated the relationship between them despite their concurrency in the developing brain. Further, because measures of cortical morphology rely on underlying gray-white matter tissue contrast, which itself is a function of white matter myelination, it is unclear if contrast-based measures of cortical development accurately reflect cortical architecture, or if they merely represent adjacent white matter maturation. This may be particularly true in young children, in whom brain structure is rapidly maturing. Here for the first time, we investigate the dynamic relationship between cortical and white matter development across early childhood, from 1 to 6years. We present measurements of cortical thickness with respect to cortical and adjacent myelin water fraction (MWF) in 33 bilateral cortical regions. Significant results in only 14 of 66 (21%) cortical regions suggest that cortical thickness measures are not heavily driven by changes in adjacent white matter, and that brain imaging studies of cortical and white matter maturation reflect distinct, but complimentary, neurodevelopmental processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.038

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A custom template previously developed by the group was used for Freesurfer segmentation of the age range of the current sample to ensure accurate cortical segmentation.

    “To ensure accurate cortical segmentation we used a custom template that our group has previously developed for Freesurfer segmentation of the age range of the current sample (Croteau-Chonka et al., 2016; Deoni et al., 2015)”
  • Prior research from our group has successfully demonstrated using Freesurfer cortical reconstruction to generate a cortical ribbon from a single (IR-SPGR) contrast acquisition for analysis of cortical myelin and thickness development between ages 1 and 6.

    “Prior research from our group has successfully demonstrated using Freesurfer cortical reconstruction to generate a cortical ribbon from a single (IR-SPGR) contrast acquisition for analysis of cortical myelin and thickness development between ages 1 and 6 (Croteau-Chonka et al., 2016, Deoni et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Croteau-Chonka, E. C., Dean, D. C., Remer, J., Dirks, H., O'Muircheartaigh, J., & Deoni, S. C. L.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Croteau-Chonka, Elise C.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
125
Pages
413-421
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1755159120
Cited by
70
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Mental Health (R01 MH087510)
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (PN 151325)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
cortical maturation, white matter myelination, cortical thickness, myelin water fraction, early childhood neurodevelopment, cortical development, brain microstructure
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Myelin Sheath, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review