Cited by 262Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recollection, Familiarity, and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis

Open access

Abstract

Episodic memory retrieval is thought to involve reinstatement of the neurocognitive processes engaged when an episode was encoded. Prior fMRI studies and computational models have suggested that reinstatement is limited to instances in which specific episodic details are recollected. We used multivoxel pattern-classification analyses of fMRI data to investigate how reinstatement is associated with different memory judgments, particularly those accompanied by recollection versus a feeling of familiarity (when recollection is absent). Classifiers were trained to distinguish between brain activity patterns associated with different encoding tasks and were subsequently applied to recognition-related fMRI data to determine the degree to which patterns were reinstated. Reinstatement was evident during both recollection- and familiarity-based judgments, providing clear evidence that reinstatement is not sufficient for eliciting a recollective experience. The findings are interpreted as support for a continuous, recollection-related neural signal that has been central to recent debate over the nature of recognition memory processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.011

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 57 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, J. D., McDuff, S. G. R., Rugg, M. D., & Norman, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
697-708
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012565553
Cited by
262
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Princeton University
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh072966-11)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH072966, P50MH062196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory retrieval, recollection, familiarity, reinstatement, recognition memory, memory judgments, encoding specificity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review