Cited by 75Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Dissociable reward and timing signals in human midbrain and ventral striatum

Open access
Klein-Flügge, Miriam C., Hunt, Laurence T., Bach, Dominik R., Dolan, Raymond J., Behrens, Timothy E.J.·2011·Neuron

Abstract

Reward prediction error (RPE) signals are central to current models of reward-learning. Temporal difference (TD) learning models posit that these signals should be modulated by predictions, not only of magnitude but also timing of reward. Here we show that BOLD activity in the VTA conforms to such TD predictions: responses to unexpected rewards are modulated by a temporal hazard function and activity between a predictive stimulus and reward is depressed in proportion to predicted reward. By contrast, BOLD activity in ventral striatum (VS) does not reflect a TD RPE, but instead encodes a signal on the variable relevant for behavior, here timing but not magnitude of reward. The results have important implications for dopaminergic models of cortico-striatal learning and suggest a modification of the conventional view that VS BOLD necessarily reflects inputs from dopaminergic VTA neurons signaling an RPE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.024

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When participants attributed outcomes to the neutral committee (their own performance), MBD activity was positively correlated with outcome.

    “When participants attributed outcomes to the neutral committee (their own performance), MBD activity was, as has been previously reported,50”

    From Two prefrontal-subcortical circuits estimate controllability and reflect its impact on learning (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Results (Relating VS Responses to Behavior) report larger ventral striatal responses when participants predicted outcome timing more accurately; the Discussion describes reward-prediction-error signals in the VTA. Neither passage addresses a neutral committee, participants attributing outcomes to their own performance, or an MBD activity–outcome correlation. Searches for those terms found no matching finding in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This approach has been used to identify links between activity in neuromodulatory nuclei and computational trajectories, such as precision-weighted prediction errors or uncertainty.

    “This approach has been used, for example, to identify links between activity in neuromodulatory nuclei and computational trajectories, such as (precision-weighted) prediction errors or uncertainty (111, 115–117).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein-Flügge, M. C., Hunt, L. T., Bach, D. R., Dolan, R. J., & Behrens, T. E. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Klein-Flügge, Miriam C.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
654-664
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126799239
Cited by
75
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
reward prediction error, temporal difference learning, ventral tegmental area, ventral striatum, reward timing, dopaminergic signaling, BOLD fMRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Basal Ganglia, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mesencephalon, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review