Cited by 537Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Dissociable systems for gain- and loss-related value predictions and errors of prediction in the human brain

Open access
Yacubian, Juliana, Gläscher, Jan, Schroeder, Katrin, Sommer, Tobias, Braus, Dieter F., Büchel, Christian·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Midbrain dopaminergic neurons projecting to the ventral striatum code for reward magnitude and probability during reward anticipation and then indicate the difference between actual and predicted outcome. It has been questioned whether such a common system for the prediction and evaluation of reward exists in humans. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and a guessing task in two large cohorts, we are able to confirm ventral striatal responses coding both reward probability and magnitude during anticipation, permitting the local computation of expected value (EV). However, the ventral striatum only represented the gain-related part of EV (EV + ). At reward delivery, the same area shows a reward probability and magnitude-dependent prediction error signal, best modeled as the difference between actual outcome and EV + . In contrast, loss-related expected value (EV − ) and the associated prediction error was represented in the amygdala. Thus, the ventral striatum and the amygdala distinctively process the value of a prediction and subsequently compute a prediction error for gains and losses, respectively. Therefore, a homeostatic balance of both systems might be important for generating adequate expectations under uncertainty. Prevalence of either part might render expectations more positive or negative, which could contribute to the pathophysiology of mood disorders like major depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2915-06.2006

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aggleton JP (2000) The amygdala. A functional analysis. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  2. Frank MJ, Seeberger LC, O'Reilly RC (2004) By carrot or by stick: cognitive reinforcement learning in parkinsonism. Science 306:1940 -1943.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yacubian, J., Gläscher, J., Schroeder, K., Sommer, T., Braus, D. F., & Büchel, C.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Büchel, Christian
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-09-13
Volume
26
Issue
37
Pages
9530-9537
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1976079390
Cited by
537
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 44
FWCI
23.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
expected value, prediction error, ventral striatum, amygdala, reward magnitude, reward probability, reward anticipation, dopaminergic neurons, mood disorders, major depressive disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Dopamine, Gambling, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Reward, Thinking, Cohort Studies, Ventral Tegmental Area, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review