Cited by 326Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

A developmental switch in the signaling cascades for LTP induction

Yasuda, Hiroki, Barth, Alison L., Stellwagen, David, Malenka, Robert C.·2003·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is thought to be critically involved not only in learning and memory, but also during the activity-dependent developmental phases of neural circuit formation and refinement. Whether the mechanisms underlying LTP change during this phase of postnatal development, however, is unknown. We report here that, unlike LTP in the more mature CA1 region of the hippocampus, LTP in neonatal rodent hippocampus (<9 postnatal days, <P9) requires cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) but not Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn985

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NMDAR-dependent LTP is greatly impaired when T286 is replaced by T286A.

    “Foremost are data, now long accepted, that NMDAR-dependent LTP is greatly impaired when T286 is replaced by T286A (43, 121, 381–384).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [381]

  • During early postnatal life, PKA but not CaMKII is required for hippocampal LTP.

    “The period of early postnatal life when GluA4 is expressed also coincides with a period where PKA, and not CaMKII, is required for hippocampal LTP (Yasuda et al., 2003).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Yasuda et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yasuda, H., Barth, A. L., Stellwagen, D., & Malenka, R. C.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Malenka, Robert C.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2002-12-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
15-16
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2077306952
Cited by
325
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
long-term potentiation, developmental switch, signaling pathways, neonatal hippocampus, CA1, postnatal development, neural circuit refinement, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Carrier Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Inhibitors, Colforsin, Hippocampus, Mutation, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Signal Transduction, Long-Term Potentiation, Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinases, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rats, Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review