Cited by 200Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Dopamine neurons respond to errors in the prediction of sensory features of expected rewards

Open access
Takahashi, Yuji K., Batchelor, Hannah M., Liu, Bing, Khanna, Akash, Morales, Marisela, Schoenbaum, Geoffrey·2017·Neuron

Abstract

Midbrain dopamine neurons have been proposed to signal prediction errors as defined in model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. While these algorithms have been extremely powerful in interpreting dopamine activity, these models do not register any error unless there is a difference between the value of what is predicted and what is received. Yet learning often occurs in response to changes in the unique features that characterize what is received, sometimes with no change in its value at all. Here, we show that classic error-signaling dopamine neurons also respond to changes in value-neutral sensory features of an expected reward. This suggests that dopamine neurons have access to a wider variety of information than contemplated by the models currently used to interpret their activity and that, while their firing may conform to predictions of these models in some cases, they are not restricted to signaling errors in the prediction of value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.025

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, VTA dopaminergic neurons fire in response to unexpected changes in the sensory properties of a reinforcer when the relative subjective value is unchanged.

    “VTA dopaminergic neurons were shown to fire in response to unexpected changes in the sensory properties of a reinforcer when the relative subjective value was unchanged (e.g. switching the flavor of an equally palatable Kool-Aid reward) (Takahashi et al., 2017; Stalnaker et al., 2019).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Takahashi et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, Y. K., Batchelor, H. M., Liu, B., Khanna, A., Morales, M., & Schoenbaum, G.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
  • Takahashi, Yuji K.
  • Schoenbaum, Geoffrey
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
1395-1405.e3
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754726085
Cited by
200
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (ZIA-DA000587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
dopaminergic neurons, prediction error, model-free reinforcement learning, sensory features, reward prediction, midbrain dopamine, reward learning, neural coding
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Male, Models, Neurological, Reward, Sensation, Ventral Tegmental Area, Animals, Genetically Modified, Rats, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review